Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLCCX vs RGAHX
GLCCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts GLCCX vs RGAHX
GLCCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLCCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLCCX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. GLCCX (1.61B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than GLCCX: RGAHX (0.40) vs GLCCX (0.00). GLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: GLCCX (29 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). GLCCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). GLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 209.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLCCX: RGAHX (250) vs GLCCX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.34 vs. GLCCX (-11.57). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.27 vs. GLCCX (-49.48).
| GLCCX | RGAHX | GLCCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.65 | 0.44 | 375% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.44 | 382% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.103 | 8.771 | -24% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.61B | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.57 | -0.34 | 3,399% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.70 | 44.30 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | -49.48 | 13.27 | -373% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.61 | 104.29 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement