Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLCGX vs RGAHX
GLCGX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts GLCGX vs RGAHX
GLCGX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLCGX vs. RGAHX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLCGX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 353B vs. GLCGX (1.62B). RGAHX pays higher dividends than GLCGX: RGAHX (0.40) vs GLCGX (0.00). GLCGX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: GLCGX (29 years) vs RGAHX (11 years). GLCGX (0.93) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). GLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 209.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLCGX: RGAHX (250) vs GLCGX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.18 vs. GLCGX (-6.07). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 13.78 vs. GLCGX (-31.55).
| GLCGX | RGAHX | GLCGX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.44 | 205% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 0.44 | 211% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.914 | 9.200 | -10% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.62B | 353B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.07 | 0.18 | -3,378% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.28 | 43.47 | 65% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.55 | 13.78 | -229% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.48 | 106.68 | 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement