Advertisement
GLDAF vs NSYC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLDAF is a Hold and NSYC is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GLDAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNSYC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GLDAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NSYC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GLDAF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NSYC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GLDAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
- NSYC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
GLDAF (@Data Processing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NSYC (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was -1.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.11%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.30%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Data Processing Services (-1.32% weekly)The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.
@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.31% weekly)The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.
| GLDAF | NSYC | GLDAF / NSYC | |
| Capitalization | 1.36B | 19.6M | 6,944% |
| EBITDA | 91.3M | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.769 | 47.541 | -12% |
| P/E Ratio | 90.18 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 277M | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 188M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 23.3M | N/A | - |
NSYC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GLDAF | NSYC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 44% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 40% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 31% | 2 days ago 42% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 30% | 2 days ago 42% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 48% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | N/A |
Advertisement
GLDAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GLDAF and NSYC have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLDAF and NSYC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLDAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLDAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NSYC - GLDAF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| WBQNL - GLDAF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| IPHLF - GLDAF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BYCRF - GLDAF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| UDMY - GLDAF | -3% Poorly correlated | -0.59% | ||
More | ||||
NSYC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NSYC and BAER have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSYC and BAER's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NSYC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NSYC | 100% | N/A | ||
| BAER - NSYC | 23% Poorly correlated | -7.62% | ||
| DNPCF - NSYC | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KPGHF - NSYC | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
| AJISF - NSYC | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GLDAF - NSYC | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||