GLDAF
Price
$1.60
Change
+$0.10 (+6.67%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.37B
NSYC
Price
$405.00
Change
+$20.96 (+5.46%)
Updated
Sep 19 closing price
Capitalization
17.66M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLDAF vs NSYC

Header iconGLDAF vs NSYC Comparison
Open Charts GLDAF vs NSYCBanner chart's image
GLOBALDATA
Price$1.60
Change+$0.10 (+6.67%)
Volume$3.18K
Capitalization1.37B
National Stock Yards
Price$405.00
Change+$20.96 (+5.46%)
Volume$2
Capitalization17.66M
GLDAF vs NSYC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLDAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSYC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLDAF vs. NSYC commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLDAF is a Hold and NSYC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (GLDAF: $1.60 vs. NSYC: $405.00)
Brand notoriety: GLDAF and NSYC are both not notable
GLDAF represents the Data Processing Services, while NSYC is part of the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLDAF: 26% vs. NSYC: 5%
Market capitalization -- GLDAF: $1.37B vs. NSYC: $17.66M
GLDAF [@Data Processing Services] is valued at $1.37B. NSYC’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $17.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Data Processing Services] industry ranges from $46.09B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Data Processing Services] industry is $5.92B. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $7.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLDAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNSYC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GLDAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NSYC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLDAF is a better buy in the long-term than NSYC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLDAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NSYC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLDAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NSYC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLDAF is a better buy in the short-term than NSYC.

Price Growth

GLDAF (@Data Processing Services) experienced а +6.67% price change this week, while NSYC (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was +5.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was -0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.06%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.97%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Data Processing Services (-0.52% weekly)

The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.

@Office Equipment/Supplies (-0.83% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLDAF($1.37B) has a higher market cap than NSYC($17.7M). NSYC YTD gains are higher at: 32.787 vs. GLDAF (-38.462).
GLDAFNSYCGLDAF / NSYC
Capitalization1.37B17.7M7,746%
EBITDA76.3MN/A-
Gain YTD-38.46232.787-117%
P/E Ratio59.16N/A-
Revenue302MN/A-
Total Cash60MN/A-
Total Debt104MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NSYC: Fundamental Ratings
NSYC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
15
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLDAFNSYC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
12%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLDAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NSYC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HDVSX15.15N/A
N/A
Hartford International Equity R4
NWHOX31.54N/A
N/A
Nationwide Bailard Tech & Sci A
GAIGX24.15N/A
N/A
Gabelli International Growth A
PRHSX79.82N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Health Sciences
ITHCX42.53N/A
N/A
Invesco Technology C

GLDAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLDAF and NSYC have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLDAF and NSYC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLDAF
1D Price
Change %
GLDAF100%
N/A
NSYC - GLDAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBQNL - GLDAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IPHLF - GLDAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BYCRF - GLDAF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UDMY - GLDAF
-3%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
More

NSYC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NSYC and BAER have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NSYC and BAER's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NSYC
1D Price
Change %
NSYC100%
N/A
BAER - NSYC
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.62%
DNPCF - NSYC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KPGHF - NSYC
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AJISF - NSYC
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GLDAF - NSYC
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More