Advertisement
GLDG vs KGC
GoldMining Inc. (GLDG) vs Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) Earnings Preview: Q1 Approaching for Both Gold Players
Key Takeaways
- GoldMining Inc. (GLDG) reported Q1 2026 (period ended February 28, 2026) net loss of C$7.25 million or $0.03 per share, in line with estimates, driven by elevated exploration spending.
- Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) gears up for Q1 2026 earnings on April 29, with analysts forecasting EPS around $0.74 amid strong gold prices.
- GLDG, a pre-production explorer, holds $26.1 million cash with focus on advancing projects like São Jorge; no revenue yet.
- KGC, a major producer, delivered record 2025 free cash flow of $2.5 billion and Q4 EPS of $0.67, beating estimates by 22%.
- Gold sector tailwinds from rising prices favor producers like KGC, while explorers like GLDG hinge on resource growth.
- Market caps contrast sharply: GLDG at ~$274 million vs. KGC at ~$41 billion.
Earnings Context and Why This Comparison Matters
GoldMining Inc. (GLDG) and Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) operate in the gold mining sector but at different stages: GLDG as an exploration firm advancing multi-asset portfolios in the Americas, and KGC as an established producer with operations spanning the U.S., Brazil, Chile, and West Africa. Earnings reports spotlight operational progress, cost discipline, and gold price leverage (currently elevated). This matchup highlights producer stability versus explorer upside, especially as Q1 disclosures reveal project momentum and financial health amid volatile commodity markets.
GoldMining Inc. Focus
GoldMining Inc. (GLDG), with fiscal year-end November 30, released Q1 2026 results (three months ended February 28, 2026) on April 10 via SEC 6-K filing. The company posted a net loss of C$7.25 million ($0.03 per share basic and diluted), aligning with consensus estimates of -$0.03. Losses stemmed from higher exploration expenses (C$1.58 million) and share-based compensation (C$1.86 million), offset by unrealized gains on equity investments (C$14.04 million), yielding comprehensive income of C$3.56 million. No revenue was recorded, consistent with its pre-production status. Cash stood at C$26.1 million, supporting ongoing advancement of projects like Whistler (Alaska) and São Jorge (Brazil). Fiscal Q2 results (ended May 31) are anticipated later.
Kinross Gold Corporation Context
Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC), on a calendar fiscal year, will unveil Q1 2026 results on April 29 after market close, followed by a conference call on April 30. Analysts project EPS of ~$0.74 and revenue near $2.4 billion, building on robust Q4 2025 performance: adjusted EPS $0.67 (beat $0.55 by 22%), revenue $2.02 billion (up 43% YoY), and record annual free cash flow (FCF) of $2.5 billion. Production remains stable at key mines like Tasiast and Paracatu, with all-in sustaining costs (AISC—a key metric for miners including sustaining capital) controlled amid gold's strength. Q1 previews suggest continued margin expansion, though weather or operational hiccups could influence output.
Head-to-Head Earnings and Market Comparison
GLDG and KGC diverge sharply in scale and earnings profile. GLDG's ongoing losses reflect exploration investments (e.g., Q1 net loss C$7.2M), with no production revenue; growth hinges on resource delineation and partnerships. Conversely, KGC generated $2.39 billion net earnings in 2025 (EPS $1.96), trading at 17x trailing P/E versus GLDG's negative multiple. KGC's FCF strength ($769M Q4) funds dividends (yield ~0.4%) and buybacks, reducing risk exposure. Sentiment favors KGC's proven execution, while GLDG offers higher beta to gold rallies via project catalysts. Both benefit from sector trends, but KGC exhibits superior earnings quality and stability.
AI Screener
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore it today to uncover potential plays in gold mining like GLDG and KGC.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron AI favors KGC with ~75% probability over the next quarter, citing superior earnings quality, record FCF generation, stable production trends, and lower risk profile versus GLDG's pre-revenue exploration burn rate—despite gold's bullish positioning for both.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLDG is a StrongBuy and KGC is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GLDG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKGC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GLDG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- KGC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GLDG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GLDG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- KGC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
GLDG (@Precious Metals) experienced а -9.62% price change this week, while KGC (@Precious Metals) price change was -3.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -9.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.51%.
Reported Earning Dates
GLDG is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2026.
KGC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Precious Metals (-9.77% weekly)The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.
| GLDG | KGC | GLDG / KGC | |
| Capitalization | 198M | 31.4B | 1% |
| EBITDA | -27.48M | 5.15B | -1% |
| Gain YTD | -26.248 | -6.360 | 413% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 11.19 | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 7.96B | - |
| Total Cash | 52.6M | 2.19B | 2% |
| Total Debt | 275K | 738M | 0% |
GLDG | KGC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 40 Fair valued | 28 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 82 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KGC's Valuation (28) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GLDG (40) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to GLDG’s over the last 12 months.
KGC's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLDG (100) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLDG’s over the last 12 months.
KGC's SMR Rating (27) in the Precious Metals industry is significantly better than the same rating for GLDG (95) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew significantly faster than GLDG’s over the last 12 months.
KGC's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GLDG (62) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to GLDG’s over the last 12 months.
KGC's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as GLDG (82) in the null industry. This means that KGC’s stock grew similarly to GLDG’s over the last 12 months.
| GLDG | KGC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 72% | 8 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 61% |
Advertisement
GLDG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLDG has been closely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLDG jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLDG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLDG | 100% | -3.27% | ||
| PAAS - GLDG | 73% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| KGC - GLDG | 72% Closely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| AEM - GLDG | 71% Closely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| EQX - GLDG | 70% Closely correlated | -2.47% | ||
| CGAU - GLDG | 70% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
More | ||||
KGC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KGC has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KGC jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.