GLL
Price
$23.63
Change
+$1.65 (+7.51%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
102.11M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ZSL
Price
$24.59
Change
+$3.64 (+17.37%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Net Assets
100.33M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLL vs ZSL

Header iconGLL vs ZSL Comparison
Open Charts GLL vs ZSLBanner chart's image
GLL vs ZSL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) vs. ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL)

Key Takeaways

  • Both GLL and ZSL are leveraged inverse (-2x) ETFs from ProShares, targeting daily performance opposite to gold and silver futures indices, respectively, with identical 0.95% expense ratios.
  • GLL tracks the Bloomberg Gold Subindex (gold futures), while ZSL follows the Bloomberg Silver Subindex (silver futures); neither holds physical metal but uses derivatives like swaps and futures.
  • Limited holdings (4-6 positions) focused on derivatives expose both to counterparty and leverage risks; designed for short-term trading due to daily reset and compounding effects.
  • ZSL exhibits higher liquidity with recent trading volumes exceeding 7 million shares versus GLL's around 2.6 million average daily volume, both maintaining tight 0.05% bid-ask spreads.
  • Silver's greater price volatility compared to gold amplifies ZSL's potential swings, making it riskier in turbulent commodity cycles.
  • Both generate K-1 tax forms and suit sophisticated investors seeking hedges against precious metals rallies.

Introduction

In the volatile precious metals market of recent months, investors seeking inverse exposure to gold and silver have turned to leveraged ETFs like GLL and ZSL. These ProShares funds offer amplified short strategies against commodity futures, appealing to traders betting on price declines amid heightened volatility from geopolitical tensions, central bank policies, and industrial demand shifts. While both provide -2x daily inverse performance within the same thematic space, they differ in underlying metal dynamics: gold's safe-haven stability versus silver's industrial sensitivity. This ETF comparison examines their structural parallels and exposure nuances, aiding decisions on hedging or tactical positioning in the current environment.

ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) Overview

ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) seeks daily investment results corresponding to two times the inverse (-2x) of the Bloomberg Gold Subindex SM, which tracks COMEX gold futures via a rolling futures position. Launched in December 2008, it employs derivatives including futures contracts (e.g., Gold 100 oz Future Jun26 at -68.92% exposure) and swaps with counterparties like Citibank NA (-58.86%) and UBS AG (-16.17%). The fund maintains 4-6 holdings, with no physical gold holdings, emphasizing short-term bearish bets.

Its expense ratio is 0.95%, with net assets around $100 million. As a non-diversified commodity pool, GLL rebalances daily to align with its objective, exposing investors to leverage, counterparty, and futures roll risks. Liquidity remains robust, featuring an average daily volume of 2.66 million shares and a 0.05% 30-day median bid-ask spread. NAV calculates at 1:30 p.m. ET, with options trading available; it issues K-1 forms annually.

ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL) Overview

ProShares UltraShort Silver (ZSL) aims for daily results equaling two times the inverse (-2x) of the Bloomberg Silver Subindex SM, reflecting COMEX silver futures performance through a rolling mechanism. Introduced in December 2008 alongside GLL, it invests in derivatives such as Silver Future Jul26 (-122.36% exposure), swaps with UBS AG (-38.20%), Goldman Sachs (-28.06%), and Citibank NA (-8.55%). Holdings total 4-6 positions, avoiding physical silver delivery.

Matching GLL's 0.95% expense ratio, ZSL manages approximately $144 million in net assets. This leveraged inverse vehicle daily resets its exposure, introducing compounding and volatility drag for holds beyond one day. It offers strong liquidity with recent volumes over 7 million shares and a 0.05% bid-ask spread. NAV computes at 1:25 p.m. ET, supports options, and produces K-1 tax documentation, underscoring its suitability for active traders.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Precious metals have navigated extreme swings in recent market cycles, driven by macroeconomic uncertainty, central bank diversification from the U.S. dollar, geopolitical escalations, and surging industrial demand for silver in solar panels, electronics, and electric vehicles. Gold benefits from safe-haven flows during equity turbulence and declining real yields (adjusted interest rates), while silver amplifies these trends with its dual monetary-industrial role, leading to higher beta (sensitivity) and volatility.

Commodity supercycles, influenced by energy transitions and supply constraints from mining regulations, have fueled capital inflows into metals ETFs. Risks include stronger-than-expected Federal Reserve tightening, U.S. dollar rebounds, and easing tensions reducing haven appeal. Futures contango (higher distant prices) impacts rolling costs, a key factor for both indices.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks, GLL and ZSL have exhibited sharp relative movements tied to underlying metals' volatility, with silver's outsized fluctuations delivering more dramatic inverse gains for ZSL during pullbacks. Gold's steadier safe-haven profile has moderated GLL's swings compared to ZSL's heightened sensitivity to industrial cycles and momentum shifts.

Over broader recent months, both have faced pressure from metals rallies fueled by rate cut expectations and geopolitical risks, though ZSL's leverage amplifies deviations in choppy environments. Volatility clustering—evident in gold's 46% and silver's 106% year-to-date spikes—highlights ZSL's riskier positioning, as silver's lower liquidity exacerbates trends. GLL offers relatively smoother inverse exposure, better suiting conservative short strategies amid sector rotation toward commodities.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes including leveraged ETFs like GLL and ZSL. Explore it today to uncover hidden insights in the precious metals space.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors ZSL over GLL, given silver's superior momentum in recent volatility and ZSL's stronger liquidity profile supporting tactical execution. While both share identical costs and structures, ZSL's alignment with silver's higher beta offers greater upside probability for inverse plays amid overextended rallies, though with elevated risk. This positioning reflects observable trend consistency and sector dynamics, not advice.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GLL vs. ZSL commentary
Jun 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLL is a StrongBuy and ZSL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLL (102M) and ZSL (100M) have similar net assets . GLL has a higher annual dividend yield than ZSL: GLL (-9.637) vs ZSL (-53.951). GLL was incepted earlier than ZSL: GLL (18 years) vs ZSL (18 years). GLL (1.26) has a lower expense ratio than ZSL (1.33).
GLLZSLGLL / ZSL
Gain YTD-9.637-53.95118%
Net Assets102M100M102%
Total Expense Ratio1.261.3395%
TurnoverN/AN/A-
Yield0.000.00-
Fund Existence18 years18 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLLZSL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ZSL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SCRUX12.62N/A
N/A
Invesco Income Advantage U.S. Fund R
SVBAX32.31N/A
N/A
JHancock Balanced A
CAPSX9.74N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Capital Income IS
CBBZX7.46N/A
N/A
AB Relative Value Z
FAPLX14.29N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Healthy Future M