Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNAX vs SCWFX
GLNAX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GLNAX vs SCWFX
GLNAX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNAX vs. SCWFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNAX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. GLNAX (67.5M). SCWFX pays higher dividends than GLNAX: SCWFX (0.58) vs GLNAX (0.35). GLNAX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GLNAX (15 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). GLNAX (1.76) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). GLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNAX: SCWFX (250) vs GLNAX (1000). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.07 vs. GLNAX (6.52). SCWFX (-3.04) and GLNAX (-3.11) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GLNAX | SCWFX | GLNAX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.07 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 1.07 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.196 | 14.547 | 70% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 67.5M | 89B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.58 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.52 | 15.07 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.56 | 40.29 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.11 | -3.04 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.70 | 81.61 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers