Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNAX vs SCWFX
GLNAX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GLNAX vs SCWFX
GLNAX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNAX vs. SCWFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNAX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. GLNAX (65.2M). SCWFX pays higher dividends than GLNAX: SCWFX (0.56) vs GLNAX (0.34). GLNAX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GLNAX (15 years) vs SCWFX (26 years). GLNAX (1.76) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). GLNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GLNAX: SCWFX (250) vs GLNAX (1000). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.85 vs. GLNAX (0.01). GLNAX return over 5 years is better than : -8.82 vs. SCWFX (-9.66).
| GLNAX | SCWFX | GLNAX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.07 | 126% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.76 | 1.07 | 164% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.442 | 12.243 | 53% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 65.2M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.34 | 0.56 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.01 | 8.85 | 0% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.84 | 37.17 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.82 | -9.66 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.40 | 81.80 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement