Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNCX vs SFCWX
GLNCX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNCX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$21.19
Change-$0.03 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.42M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$71.08
Change+$0.03 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets75.3B
GLNCX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNCX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCX is a Hold and SFCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 75.3B vs. GLNCX (74.4M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: SFCWX (0.96) vs GLNCX (0.00). GLNCX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNCX (13 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). GLNCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNCX (1000) vs SFCWX (1000000). GLNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.26 vs. SFCWX (4.12). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 19.10 vs. GLNCX (14.89).
| GLNCX | SFCWX | GLNCX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.65 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 0.65 | 394% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.956 | 3.165 | 220% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.4M | 75.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.96 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.26 | 4.12 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.98 | 17.48 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.89 | 19.10 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.70 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement