Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNCX vs SFCWX
GLNCX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNCX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$21.51
Change+$0.24 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.68M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$73.63
Change+$0.94 (+1.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.91B
GLNCX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNCX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCX is a Buy and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 76.9B vs. GLNCX (74.7M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: SFCWX (0.96) vs GLNCX (0.00). GLNCX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNCX (14 years) vs SFCWX (8 years). GLNCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNCX (1000) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX (9.71) and GLNCX (9.36) have marching annual gain over last year. SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 25.43 vs. GLNCX (19.83).
| GLNCX | SFCWX | GLNCX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.65 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 0.65 | 394% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.208 | 6.946 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 74.7M | 76.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.96 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.36 | 9.71 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.38 | 30.53 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.83 | 25.43 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 42.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers