Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNCX vs SFCWX
GLNCX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GLNCX vs SFCWX
MFS Global New Discovery C
Price$22.16
Change-$0.13 (-0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets72.33M
American Funds SMALLCAP World F3
Price$77.30
Change-$0.60 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets81.39B
GLNCX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNCX vs. SFCWX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCX is a StrongBuy and SFCWX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 81.4B vs. GLNCX (72.3M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GLNCX: SFCWX (0.91) vs GLNCX (0.00). GLNCX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GLNCX (14 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). GLNCX (2.56) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GLNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SFCWX (32.00). GLNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GLNCX (1000) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.94 vs. GLNCX (8.20). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : 21.80 vs. GLNCX (13.18).
| GLNCX | SFCWX | GLNCX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.10 | 0.65 | 323% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.56 | 0.65 | 394% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.694 | 12.276 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 72.3M | 81.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.91 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.20 | 11.94 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.29 | 35.67 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.18 | 21.80 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.75 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement