GLNCY
Price
$7.74
Change
+$0.20 (+2.65%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
44.5B
80 days until earnings call
IVPAF
Price
$8.48
Change
+$0.20 (+2.42%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
11.48B
99 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLNCY vs IVPAF

Header iconGLNCY vs IVPAF Comparison
Open Charts GLNCY vs IVPAFBanner chart's image
Glencore
Price$7.74
Change+$0.20 (+2.65%)
Volume$2.66M
Capitalization44.5B
Ivanhoe Mines
Price$8.48
Change+$0.20 (+2.42%)
Volume$510K
Capitalization11.48B
GLNCY vs IVPAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLNCY vs. IVPAF commentary
Aug 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNCY is a Hold and IVPAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 10, 2025
Stock price -- (GLNCY: $7.74 vs. IVPAF: $8.48)
Brand notoriety: GLNCY and IVPAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLNCY: 374% vs. IVPAF: 221%
Market capitalization -- GLNCY: $44.5B vs. IVPAF: $11.48B
GLNCY [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $44.5B. IVPAF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $11.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLNCY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileIVPAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLNCY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • IVPAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GLNCY is a better buy in the long-term than IVPAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLNCY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IVPAF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLNCY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • IVPAF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IVPAF is a better buy in the short-term than GLNCY.

Price Growth

GLNCY (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -2.27% price change this week, while IVPAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +9.84% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +105.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLNCY is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

IVPAF is expected to report earnings on Nov 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.55% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLNCY($44.5B) has a higher market cap than IVPAF($11.5B). IVPAF has higher P/E ratio than GLNCY: IVPAF (29.23) vs GLNCY (14.59). GLNCY YTD gains are higher at: -9.970 vs. IVPAF (-28.378). GLNCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 8.52B vs. IVPAF (355M). GLNCY has more cash in the bank: 1.42B vs. IVPAF (655M). IVPAF has less debt than GLNCY: IVPAF (1.17B) vs GLNCY (38.1B). GLNCY has higher revenues than IVPAF: GLNCY (231B) vs IVPAF (215M).
GLNCYIVPAFGLNCY / IVPAF
Capitalization44.5B11.5B387%
EBITDA8.52B355M2,400%
Gain YTD-9.970-28.37835%
P/E Ratio14.5929.2350%
Revenue231B215M107,442%
Total Cash1.42B655M216%
Total Debt38.1B1.17B3,262%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLNCY vs IVPAF: Fundamental Ratings
GLNCY
IVPAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9079
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5857
SMR RATING
1..100
10076
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5962
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6598
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IVPAF's Valuation (91) in the null industry is in the same range as GLNCY (95). This means that IVPAF’s stock grew similarly to GLNCY’s over the last 12 months.

IVPAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as GLNCY (58). This means that IVPAF’s stock grew similarly to GLNCY’s over the last 12 months.

IVPAF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as GLNCY (100). This means that IVPAF’s stock grew similarly to GLNCY’s over the last 12 months.

GLNCY's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as IVPAF (62). This means that GLNCY’s stock grew similarly to IVPAF’s over the last 12 months.

GLNCY's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IVPAF (98). This means that GLNCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than IVPAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLNCYIVPAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLNCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IVPAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IFV23.790.17
+0.73%
First Trust Dorsey Wright Intl Foc 5
JGLO65.840.44
+0.67%
JPMorgan Global Select Equity ETF
ITDF35.000.18
+0.52%
iShares LifePath Target Date 2050 ETF
ONEV130.130.43
+0.33%
SPDR® Russell 1000 Low Vol Foc ETF
SLDR50.17-0.01
-0.02%
Global X Short-Term Treasury Ladder ETF

GLNCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLNCY has been closely correlated with RIO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLNCY jumps, then RIO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLNCY
1D Price
Change %
GLNCY100%
+2.65%
RIO - GLNCY
75%
Closely correlated
+1.79%
BHP - GLNCY
74%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
BDNNY - GLNCY
72%
Closely correlated
+1.42%
TECK - GLNCY
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
IVPAF - GLNCY
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.42%
More

IVPAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IVPAF has been closely correlated with TECK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IVPAF jumps, then TECK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IVPAF
1D Price
Change %
IVPAF100%
+2.42%
TECK - IVPAF
70%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
GLNCY - IVPAF
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.65%
BHP - IVPAF
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
GLCNF - IVPAF
57%
Loosely correlated
+3.03%
RIO - IVPAF
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
More