Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNKX vs SCWFX
GLNKX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GLNKX vs SCWFX
GLNKX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNKX vs. SCWFX commentary
Jul 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNKX is a Buy and SCWFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. GLNKX (66.4M). SCWFX pays higher dividends than GLNKX: SCWFX (0.54) vs GLNKX (0.16). GLNKX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GLNKX (15 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). GLNKX (2.01) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). GLNKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). GLNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCWFX: GLNKX (0) vs SCWFX (250). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.19 vs. GLNKX (1.74). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : -4.10 vs. GLNKX (-4.71).
| GLNKX | SCWFX | GLNKX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.07 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.07 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.413 | 13.687 | 47% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 66.4M | 94.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.54 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.74 | 14.19 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.48 | 34.24 | 63% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.71 | -4.10 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.19 | 88.30 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement