Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNKX vs SCWFX
GLNKX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GLNKX vs SCWFX
GLNKX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNKX vs. SCWFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNKX is a Buy and SCWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 88.9B vs. GLNKX (67.1M). SCWFX pays higher dividends than GLNKX: SCWFX (0.59) vs GLNKX (0.16). GLNKX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GLNKX (14 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). GLNKX (2.01) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). GLNKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). GLNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCWFX: GLNKX (0) vs SCWFX (250). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.36 vs. GLNKX (5.83). GLNKX return over 5 years is better than : -1.87 vs. SCWFX (-3.29).
| GLNKX | SCWFX | GLNKX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.07 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.07 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.811 | 12.049 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 67.1M | 88.9B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.59 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.83 | 20.36 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.76 | 37.07 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.87 | -3.29 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.85 | 87.19 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement