Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLNKX vs SCWFX
GLNKX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GLNKX vs SCWFX
GLNKX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLNKX vs. SCWFX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLNKX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. GLNKX (65.2M). SCWFX pays higher dividends than GLNKX: SCWFX (0.56) vs GLNKX (0.16). GLNKX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GLNKX (15 years) vs SCWFX (26 years). GLNKX (2.01) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). GLNKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). GLNKX has a lower initial minimum investment than SCWFX: GLNKX (0) vs SCWFX (250). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.85 vs. GLNKX (-0.28). SCWFX (-9.66) and GLNKX (-10.14) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GLNKX | SCWFX | GLNKX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 1.07 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 1.07 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.325 | 12.243 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 65.2M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.16 | 0.56 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.28 | 8.85 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.87 | 37.17 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.14 | -9.66 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.40 | 81.80 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers