Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLOV vs QWLD
GLOV vs QWLD Comparison
Open Charts GLOV vs QWLD
Goldman Sachs ActBt Wld Lw Vl Ps Eq ETF
Price$56.41
Change+$0.61 (+1.09%)
Volume$477
Net Assets1.49B
SPDR® MSCI World StrategicFactors ETF
Price$140.67
Change+$2.20 (+1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets171.07M
GLOV vs QWLD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLOV vs. QWLD commentary
Nov 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLOV is a Hold and QWLD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLOV has more net assets: 1.49B vs. QWLD (171M). GLOV has a higher annual dividend yield than QWLD: GLOV (14.523) vs QWLD (12.840). GLOV was incepted earlier than QWLD: GLOV (4 years) vs QWLD (11 years). GLOV (0.25) has a lower expense ratio than QWLD (0.30). GLOV has a higher turnover QWLD (18.00) vs QWLD (18.00).
| GLOV | QWLD | GLOV / QWLD | |
| Gain YTD | 14.523 | 12.840 | 113% |
| Net Assets | 1.49B | 171M | 871% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.25 | 0.30 | 83% |
| Turnover | 25.00 | 18.00 | 139% |
| Yield | 1.76 | 1.70 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GLOV | QWLD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 83% | 10 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
GLOV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLOV has been closely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLOV jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLOV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLOV | 100% | -0.63% | ||
| MCO - GLOV | 78% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| BN - GLOV | 75% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| L - GLOV | 74% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| LIN - GLOV | 73% Closely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| MA - GLOV | 73% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
More | ||||
QWLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QWLD has been loosely correlated with V. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QWLD jumps, then V could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QWLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QWLD | 100% | -1.02% | ||
| V - QWLD | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| MSFT - QWLD | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| META - QWLD | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| AAPL - QWLD | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| NVDA - QWLD | 47% Loosely correlated | -3.15% | ||
More | ||||