Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GLRBX vs HBLAX
GLRBX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts GLRBX vs HBLAX
GLRBX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GLRBX vs. HBLAX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLRBX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 10.9B vs. GLRBX (407M). HBLAX pays higher dividends than GLRBX: HBLAX (3.13) vs GLRBX (1.13). GLRBX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: GLRBX (35 years) vs HBLAX (20 years). GLRBX (1.23) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. GLRBX (27.00). GLRBX (2000) and HBLAX (2000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to GLRBX: HBLAX (2000) vs GLRBX (500). GLRBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.86 vs. HBLAX (1.22). GLRBX return over 5 years is better than : 12.44 vs. HBLAX (4.63).
| GLRBX | HBLAX | GLRBX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.89 | 138% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.23 | 0.89 | 138% |
| Fund Existence | 35 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.626 | 4.076 | 113% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 407M | 10.9B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.13 | 3.13 | 36% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.86 | 1.22 | 316% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.21 | 19.75 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.44 | 4.63 | 269% |
| Returns for 10 years | 15.70 | 39.00 | 40% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement