GLU | ROBO | GLU / ROBO | |
Gain YTD | 6.905 | 0.480 | 1,439% |
Net Assets | 94.8M | 1.04B | 9% |
Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Turnover | 3.00 | 24.00 | 13% |
Yield | 8.04 | 0.05 | 16,742% |
Fund Existence | 21 years | 11 years | - |
GLU | ROBO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | 4 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago89% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago85% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% | 4 days ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | 4 days ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago87% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago76% | 4 days ago84% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago90% | 4 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GLU and AES have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLU and AES's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ROBO has been closely correlated with MCHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ROBO jumps, then MCHP could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ROBO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ROBO | 100% | -0.72% | ||
MCHP - ROBO | 72% Closely correlated | +3.05% | ||
TER - ROBO | 72% Closely correlated | +0.96% | ||
NOVT - ROBO | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.47% | ||
ADSK - ROBO | 65% Loosely correlated | -2.88% | ||
CGNX - ROBO | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.28% | ||
More |