GLU | ROBO | GLU / ROBO | |
Gain YTD | 9.822 | -11.074 | -89% |
Net Assets | 94.5M | 865M | 11% |
Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.95 | 144% |
Turnover | 3.00 | 26.00 | 12% |
Yield | 0.79 | 0.60 | 131% |
Fund Existence | 21 years | 12 years | - |
GLU | ROBO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago85% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago77% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago84% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago84% | 2 days ago85% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago84% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago90% | 2 days ago86% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 19 days ago75% | 18 days ago85% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago81% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GLU and AES have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLU and AES's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ROBO has been closely correlated with NOVT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ROBO jumps, then NOVT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ROBO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ROBO | 100% | +2.56% | ||
NOVT - ROBO | 77% Closely correlated | +4.52% | ||
MCHP - ROBO | 72% Closely correlated | +12.38% | ||
TER - ROBO | 72% Closely correlated | +5.63% | ||
ATS - ROBO | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.60% | ||
ADSK - ROBO | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.75% | ||
More |