Investors seeking exposure to the hardware layer of the artificial intelligence revolution are increasingly looking beyond semiconductor names to the companies that supply the physical infrastructure enabling AI workloads. This comparison examines two such companies: GLW (Corning Inc.), the 170-year-old materials science leader known for Gorilla Glass and optical fiber, and TTMI (TTM Technologies Inc.), a specialized manufacturer of advanced printed circuit boards and radio frequency components. Though they operate at vastly different scales, both have posted double-digit revenue growth driven by surging demand for data center and AI-related products. This stock comparison is relevant for investors evaluating different approaches to capturing value in the evolving AI hardware ecosystem.
Corning Inc. (GLW) is one of the world's foremost materials science companies, operating across six primary segments: Optical Communications, Display Technologies, Specialty Materials, Automotive, Life Sciences, and Hemlock and Emerging Growth Businesses. The company is best known for its Gorilla Glass used in smartphones and tablets, but its largest and fastest-growing segment is Optical Communications, which now accounts for roughly 40% of net sales and has been the primary beneficiary of AI-driven data center buildouts.
In recent months, GLW has delivered a string of record-setting quarterly results. For full-year 2025, the company reported core sales of $16.41 billion, up 13% year over year, while core EPS (earnings per share) jumped 29% to $2.52. The fourth quarter alone saw core sales climb 14% to $4.41 billion and core EPS rise 26% to $0.72. Notably, the company's Optical Communications segment posted 24% year-over-year growth in Q4 2025, powered by enterprise demand for Gen AI connectivity products. Corning's management has also upgraded its Springboard plan, now targeting an additional $11 billion in annualized sales by the end of 2028, up from the original $8 billion target. Other significant catalysts include a $2.5 billion commitment from Apple to produce iPhone and Apple Watch cover glass at Corning's Kentucky facility and a multi-billion-dollar optical fiber agreement with Meta. The company's core operating margin reached 20.2% in Q4 2025, reflecting a 390-basis-point improvement since the Springboard plan launched.
TTM Technologies Inc. (TTMI) is a leading global manufacturer of technology products including mission systems, radio frequency (RF) components, RF microwave and microelectronic assemblies, and technologically advanced printed circuit boards (PCBs) and substrates. The company serves several high-value end markets, with Aerospace and Defense representing 41% of net sales and Data Center Computing accounting for 28% in its most recent quarter. TTM's name itself stands for "time-to-market," reflecting its emphasis on accelerating customers' product development timelines.
TTMI has experienced powerful momentum in recent quarters, benefiting from strong demand across both defense and AI-related computing markets. Full-year 2025 net sales reached $2.9 billion, a 19% increase from the prior year, while non-GAAP EPS rose 45% to $2.46. In the fourth quarter, the company achieved an all-time quarterly record non-GAAP EPS of $0.70 on net sales of $774.3 million, also up 19% year over year. Combined Data Center Computing and Networking revenues grew to 36% of total company sales, driven by generative AI demand. TTMI's Aerospace and Defense program backlog stood at $1.6 billion, with a total book-to-bill ratio of 1.35 in Q4, indicating healthy forward demand. Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) margins expanded to 16.3% of net sales. For fiscal 2026, management has guided for 15–20% revenue growth, with ambitions to double earnings between 2025 and 2027 through organic growth and strategic capacity investments in North America and Southeast Asia.
For traders and investors looking to navigate stock comparisons like this one with data-driven precision, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's most compelling AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. These bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics, with some bots generating historically simulated annualized returns well into the double digits through real-time pattern recognition and technical analysis. Each bot is designed with a distinct approach — from swing trading to long-term trend following — and focuses on a specific set of tickers tailored to its strategy. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help investors discover which automated strategies are currently excelling in today's market environment.
The most striking contrast between GLW and TTMI is one of scale and diversification. GLW generated $16.41 billion in core sales in 2025 — more than five times TTMI's $2.9 billion — and operates across six distinct business segments spanning consumer electronics, automotive, life sciences, and telecommunications. TTMI, by comparison, is far more concentrated, with two end markets — Aerospace & Defense and Data Center Computing — together accounting for roughly 69% of sales. This concentration has been a tailwind as both defense and AI spending surged, but it also makes TTMI more sensitive to shifts in government procurement cycles or enterprise capital expenditure decisions.
On profitability, GLW's core operating margin of 20.2% reflects strong pricing power and economies of scale, while TTMI's non-GAAP operating margin of 12.7% — though improving — reflects the more capital-intensive, lower-margin nature of PCB manufacturing. However, TTMI's growth rate has been faster: 19% revenue growth in both Q4 and full-year 2025 versus GLW's 13–14%. Both companies are AI beneficiaries, but through different channels: GLW provides the optical fiber that connects data centers, while TTMI provides the advanced circuit boards inside the servers. From a valuation perspective, GLW's larger market capitalization (over $94 billion as of early 2026) reflects its established brand, diversified revenue base, and consumer-facing products, while TTMI's smaller scale presents a different risk-reward calculus. TTMI also carries a debt load of $916 million against $501 million in cash, whereas GLW's $1.52 billion in cash against $7.63 billion in long-term debt reflects a more leveraged but also more institutionally financed balance sheet appropriate for a company of its size.
In a head-to-head stock comparison, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely find both GLW and TTMI to be in strong uptrends with meaningful AI-related catalysts. However, the AI might express a measured preference for GLW based on several observable factors: broader diversification across six business segments that reduces single-market dependency, a higher and more consistently expanding core operating margin (20.2% versus 12.7%), substantial free cash flow generation of $1.72 billion, and multiple visible growth catalysts — including the Springboard plan upgrade, the Apple and Meta agreements, and sustained optical communications momentum. TTMI's faster top-line growth and record earnings trajectory are compelling, but the company's concentrated exposure to defense and data center spending — while currently advantageous — introduces greater sensitivity to sector-specific headwinds. On balance, the AI would likely view GLW as offering the stronger combination of growth consistency, margin expansion, and risk diversification in the current market environment.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GLW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTTMI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GLW’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTMI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
GLW (@Electronic Components) experienced а -19.01% price change this week, while TTMI (@Electronic Components) price change was -9.86% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.88%.
GLW is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
TTMI is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| GLW | TTMI | GLW / TTMI | |
| Capitalization | 133B | 13.7B | 971% |
| EBITDA | 4.07B | 422M | 965% |
| Gain YTD | 77.177 | 91.304 | 85% |
| P/E Ratio | 74.33 | 71.74 | 104% |
| Revenue | 16.3B | 3.1B | 525% |
| Total Cash | 1.76B | 410M | 428% |
| Total Debt | 9.92B | 1.05B | 946% |
GLW | TTMI | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 73 Overvalued | 62 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 39 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 54 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | 42 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TTMI's Valuation (62) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as GLW (73). This means that TTMI’s stock grew similarly to GLW’s over the last 12 months.
TTMI's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as GLW (42). This means that TTMI’s stock grew similarly to GLW’s over the last 12 months.
GLW's SMR Rating (54) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TTMI (67). This means that GLW’s stock grew similarly to TTMI’s over the last 12 months.
GLW's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TTMI (42). This means that GLW’s stock grew similarly to TTMI’s over the last 12 months.
TTMI's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLW (80). This means that TTMI’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLW’s over the last 12 months.
| GLW | TTMI | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 70% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 4 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago 67% | 6 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 61% | 8 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 81% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTMI has been closely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TTMI jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TTMI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TTMI | 100% | +1.43% | ||
| BHE - TTMI | 70% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| FN - TTMI | 67% Closely correlated | +3.95% | ||
| CLS - TTMI | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.83% | ||
| PLXS - TTMI | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| LFUS - TTMI | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.06% | ||
More | ||||