GLW
Price
$154.92
Change
+$0.31 (+0.20%)
Updated
Jul 20, 03:28 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
133.06B
8 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TTMI
Price
$137.16
Change
+$5.16 (+3.91%)
Updated
Jul 20, 02:31 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.71B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLW vs TTMI

GLW vs TTMI Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Corning Inc. (GLW) vs. TTM Technologies Inc. (TTMI) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Corning Inc. (GLW) is a diversified materials science giant with $16.4 billion in core sales for fiscal 2025, while TTM Technologies (TTMI) is a specialized PCB and RF components manufacturer with $2.9 billion in net sales for the same period.
  • Both companies are riding the generative AI infrastructure wave, but through different channels: GLW via optical fiber and connectivity solutions, and TTMI via advanced printed circuit boards (PCBs) for data centers.
  • GLW's upgraded Springboard plan targets $11 billion in incremental annualized sales by 2028, while TTMI is targeting 15–20% annual revenue growth with a goal to double earnings from 2025 to 2027.
  • TTMI recorded an all-time quarterly high non-GAAP EPS of $0.70 in Q4 2025, while GLW delivered core EPS of $0.72 with significantly larger scale and a core operating margin of 20.2%.
  • GLW offers breadth across six business segments; TTMI is concentrated in aerospace and defense (41% of sales) and data center computing (28%), making each stock's risk profile meaningfully different.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to the hardware layer of the artificial intelligence revolution are increasingly looking beyond semiconductor names to the companies that supply the physical infrastructure enabling AI workloads. This comparison examines two such companies: GLW (Corning Inc.), the 170-year-old materials science leader known for Gorilla Glass and optical fiber, and TTMI (TTM Technologies Inc.), a specialized manufacturer of advanced printed circuit boards and radio frequency components. Though they operate at vastly different scales, both have posted double-digit revenue growth driven by surging demand for data center and AI-related products. This stock comparison is relevant for investors evaluating different approaches to capturing value in the evolving AI hardware ecosystem.

GLW Overview and Recent Performance

Corning Inc. (GLW) is one of the world's foremost materials science companies, operating across six primary segments: Optical Communications, Display Technologies, Specialty Materials, Automotive, Life Sciences, and Hemlock and Emerging Growth Businesses. The company is best known for its Gorilla Glass used in smartphones and tablets, but its largest and fastest-growing segment is Optical Communications, which now accounts for roughly 40% of net sales and has been the primary beneficiary of AI-driven data center buildouts.

In recent months, GLW has delivered a string of record-setting quarterly results. For full-year 2025, the company reported core sales of $16.41 billion, up 13% year over year, while core EPS (earnings per share) jumped 29% to $2.52. The fourth quarter alone saw core sales climb 14% to $4.41 billion and core EPS rise 26% to $0.72. Notably, the company's Optical Communications segment posted 24% year-over-year growth in Q4 2025, powered by enterprise demand for Gen AI connectivity products. Corning's management has also upgraded its Springboard plan, now targeting an additional $11 billion in annualized sales by the end of 2028, up from the original $8 billion target. Other significant catalysts include a $2.5 billion commitment from Apple to produce iPhone and Apple Watch cover glass at Corning's Kentucky facility and a multi-billion-dollar optical fiber agreement with Meta. The company's core operating margin reached 20.2% in Q4 2025, reflecting a 390-basis-point improvement since the Springboard plan launched.

TTMI Overview and Recent Performance

TTM Technologies Inc. (TTMI) is a leading global manufacturer of technology products including mission systems, radio frequency (RF) components, RF microwave and microelectronic assemblies, and technologically advanced printed circuit boards (PCBs) and substrates. The company serves several high-value end markets, with Aerospace and Defense representing 41% of net sales and Data Center Computing accounting for 28% in its most recent quarter. TTM's name itself stands for "time-to-market," reflecting its emphasis on accelerating customers' product development timelines.

TTMI has experienced powerful momentum in recent quarters, benefiting from strong demand across both defense and AI-related computing markets. Full-year 2025 net sales reached $2.9 billion, a 19% increase from the prior year, while non-GAAP EPS rose 45% to $2.46. In the fourth quarter, the company achieved an all-time quarterly record non-GAAP EPS of $0.70 on net sales of $774.3 million, also up 19% year over year. Combined Data Center Computing and Networking revenues grew to 36% of total company sales, driven by generative AI demand. TTMI's Aerospace and Defense program backlog stood at $1.6 billion, with a total book-to-bill ratio of 1.35 in Q4, indicating healthy forward demand. Adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) margins expanded to 16.3% of net sales. For fiscal 2026, management has guided for 15–20% revenue growth, with ambitions to double earnings between 2025 and 2027 through organic growth and strategic capacity investments in North America and Southeast Asia.

Trending AI Robots

For traders and investors looking to navigate stock comparisons like this one with data-driven precision, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's most compelling AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. These bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics, with some bots generating historically simulated annualized returns well into the double digits through real-time pattern recognition and technical analysis. Each bot is designed with a distinct approach — from swing trading to long-term trend following — and focuses on a specific set of tickers tailored to its strategy. Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help investors discover which automated strategies are currently excelling in today's market environment.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most striking contrast between GLW and TTMI is one of scale and diversification. GLW generated $16.41 billion in core sales in 2025 — more than five times TTMI's $2.9 billion — and operates across six distinct business segments spanning consumer electronics, automotive, life sciences, and telecommunications. TTMI, by comparison, is far more concentrated, with two end markets — Aerospace & Defense and Data Center Computing — together accounting for roughly 69% of sales. This concentration has been a tailwind as both defense and AI spending surged, but it also makes TTMI more sensitive to shifts in government procurement cycles or enterprise capital expenditure decisions.

On profitability, GLW's core operating margin of 20.2% reflects strong pricing power and economies of scale, while TTMI's non-GAAP operating margin of 12.7% — though improving — reflects the more capital-intensive, lower-margin nature of PCB manufacturing. However, TTMI's growth rate has been faster: 19% revenue growth in both Q4 and full-year 2025 versus GLW's 13–14%. Both companies are AI beneficiaries, but through different channels: GLW provides the optical fiber that connects data centers, while TTMI provides the advanced circuit boards inside the servers. From a valuation perspective, GLW's larger market capitalization (over $94 billion as of early 2026) reflects its established brand, diversified revenue base, and consumer-facing products, while TTMI's smaller scale presents a different risk-reward calculus. TTMI also carries a debt load of $916 million against $501 million in cash, whereas GLW's $1.52 billion in cash against $7.63 billion in long-term debt reflects a more leveraged but also more institutionally financed balance sheet appropriate for a company of its size.

Tickeron AI Verdict

In a head-to-head stock comparison, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely find both GLW and TTMI to be in strong uptrends with meaningful AI-related catalysts. However, the AI might express a measured preference for GLW based on several observable factors: broader diversification across six business segments that reduces single-market dependency, a higher and more consistently expanding core operating margin (20.2% versus 12.7%), substantial free cash flow generation of $1.72 billion, and multiple visible growth catalysts — including the Springboard plan upgrade, the Apple and Meta agreements, and sustained optical communications momentum. TTMI's faster top-line growth and record earnings trajectory are compelling, but the company's concentrated exposure to defense and data center spending — while currently advantageous — introduces greater sensitivity to sector-specific headwinds. On balance, the AI would likely view GLW as offering the stronger combination of growth consistency, margin expansion, and risk diversification in the current market environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GLW vs. TTMI commentary
Jul 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLW is a Hold and TTMI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 20, 2026
Stock price -- (GLW: $154.61 vs. TTMI: $132.00)
Brand notoriety: GLW: Notable vs. TTMI: Not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLW: 97% vs. TTMI: 47%
Market capitalization -- GLW: $133.06B vs. TTMI: $13.71B
GLW [@Electronic Components] is valued at $133.06B. TTMI’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $13.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $186.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $12.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLW’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTTMI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TTMI’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TTMI is a better buy in the long-term than GLW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLW’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTMI’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • TTMI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TTMI is a better buy in the short-term than GLW.

Price Growth

GLW (@Electronic Components) experienced а -19.01% price change this week, while TTMI (@Electronic Components) price change was -9.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was -1.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLW is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

TTMI is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (-1.29% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GLW($133B) has a higher market cap than TTMI($13.7B). GLW (74.33) and TTMI (71.74) have similar P/E ratio . TTMI YTD gains are higher at: 91.304 vs. GLW (77.177). GLW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.07B vs. TTMI (422M). GLW has more cash in the bank: 1.76B vs. TTMI (410M). TTMI has less debt than GLW: TTMI (1.05B) vs GLW (9.92B). GLW has higher revenues than TTMI: GLW (16.3B) vs TTMI (3.1B).
GLWTTMIGLW / TTMI
Capitalization133B13.7B971%
EBITDA4.07B422M965%
Gain YTD77.17791.30485%
P/E Ratio74.3371.74104%
Revenue16.3B3.1B525%
Total Cash1.76B410M428%
Total Debt9.92B1.05B946%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLW vs TTMI: Fundamental Ratings
GLW
TTMI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4239
SMR RATING
1..100
5467
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3742
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8034
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TTMI's Valuation (62) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as GLW (73). This means that TTMI’s stock grew similarly to GLW’s over the last 12 months.

TTMI's Profit vs Risk Rating (39) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as GLW (42). This means that TTMI’s stock grew similarly to GLW’s over the last 12 months.

GLW's SMR Rating (54) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TTMI (67). This means that GLW’s stock grew similarly to TTMI’s over the last 12 months.

GLW's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as TTMI (42). This means that GLW’s stock grew similarly to TTMI’s over the last 12 months.

TTMI's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLW (80). This means that TTMI’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLWTTMI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TTMI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHCT18.810.23
+1.24%
Community Healthcare Trust
CSPI8.16-0.05
-0.61%
CSP
TNET59.56-0.91
-1.50%
Trinet Group
JHX25.82-1.14
-4.23%
JAMES HARDIE INDUSTRIES plc
OCG1.45-0.07
-4.61%
Oriental Culture Holding Ltd

TTMI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTMI has been closely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TTMI jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTMI
1D Price
Change %
TTMI100%
+1.43%
BHE - TTMI
70%
Closely correlated
+1.36%
FN - TTMI
67%
Closely correlated
+3.95%
CLS - TTMI
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
PLXS - TTMI
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.74%
LFUS - TTMI
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
More