GLXZ
Price
$2.82
Change
+$0.01 (+0.36%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
65.98M
MLCO
Price
$7.11
Change
+$0.05 (+0.71%)
Updated
Jun 27, 02:32 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.3B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GLXZ vs MLCO

Header iconGLXZ vs MLCO Comparison
Open Charts GLXZ vs MLCOBanner chart's image
Galaxy Gaming
Price$2.82
Change+$0.01 (+0.36%)
Volume$41.71K
Capitalization65.98M
Melco Resorts & Entertainment
Price$7.11
Change+$0.05 (+0.71%)
Volume$802
Capitalization3.3B
GLXZ vs MLCO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GLXZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GLXZ vs. MLCO commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GLXZ is a Hold and MLCO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (GLXZ: $2.82 vs. MLCO: $7.06)
Brand notoriety: GLXZ: Not notable vs. MLCO: Notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GLXZ: 155% vs. MLCO: 68%
Market capitalization -- GLXZ: $65.98M vs. MLCO: $3.3B
GLXZ [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $65.98M. MLCO’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $3.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GLXZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMLCO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GLXZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MLCO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GLXZ and MLCO are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GLXZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLCO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GLXZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MLCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLXZ is a better buy in the short-term than MLCO.

Price Growth

GLXZ (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +1.44% price change this week, while MLCO (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +10.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +2.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.34%.

Reported Earning Dates

GLXZ is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

MLCO is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+2.85% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLCO($3.3B) has a higher market cap than GLXZ($66M). MLCO YTD gains are higher at: 21.934 vs. GLXZ (1.952). MLCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 634M vs. GLXZ (9.48M). MLCO has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. GLXZ (16.4M). GLXZ has less debt than MLCO: GLXZ (54.4M) vs MLCO (7.77B). MLCO has higher revenues than GLXZ: MLCO (3.78B) vs GLXZ (24.9M).
GLXZMLCOGLXZ / MLCO
Capitalization66M3.3B2%
EBITDA9.48M634M1%
Gain YTD1.95221.9349%
P/E Ratio125.00N/A-
Revenue24.9M3.78B1%
Total Cash16.4M1.31B1%
Total Debt54.4M7.77B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GLXZ vs MLCO: Fundamental Ratings
GLXZ
MLCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9013
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
81
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67100
SMR RATING
1..100
53100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4543
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6866
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MLCO's Valuation (81) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as GLXZ (84) in the null industry. This means that MLCO’s stock grew similarly to GLXZ’s over the last 12 months.

GLXZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLCO (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that GLXZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLCO’s over the last 12 months.

GLXZ's SMR Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MLCO (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that GLXZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than MLCO’s over the last 12 months.

MLCO's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as GLXZ (45) in the null industry. This means that MLCO’s stock grew similarly to GLXZ’s over the last 12 months.

MLCO's P/E Growth Rating (66) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as GLXZ (68) in the null industry. This means that MLCO’s stock grew similarly to GLXZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GLXZMLCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GLXZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MLCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAKSY9.950.16
+1.63%
Marks & Spencer Group Plc
NRILY39.440.22
+0.56%
Nomura Research Institute Ltd.
ORZCF0.86N/A
-0.09%
Orezone Gold Corp.
PPRUY20.45-0.13
-0.63%
Kering SA
BLOZF0.45-0.02
-3.81%
Cannabix Technologies Inc.

GLXZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GLXZ and MLCO have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLXZ and MLCO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLXZ
1D Price
Change %
GLXZ100%
+0.36%
MLCO - GLXZ
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
EIHDF - GLXZ
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GIGNF - GLXZ
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMVHF - GLXZ
3%
Poorly correlated
+5.02%
GMALF - GLXZ
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More