Advertisement
LVS vs MLCO
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) vs. Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- LVS boasts a significantly larger market capitalization of approximately $38.4 billion compared to MLCO's $2.4 billion, reflecting greater scale in the integrated resorts sector.
- Recent market activity shows LVS delivering stronger year-to-date returns around 11.7%, while MLCO has faced more volatility with mixed YTD figures near -21% in some metrics.
- Both stocks benefit from Macau gaming recovery, but LVS exhibits higher profitability with a 12.5% profit margin versus MLCO's 3.6%.
- MLCO trades at a lower trailing P/E ratio (price-to-earnings, 12.9) than LVS (24.3), suggesting relative value but higher risk exposure in Asia-focused operations.
- Upcoming Q1 earnings for LVS on April 22, 2026, with expected EPS (earnings per share) of $0.76, could drive further momentum amid positive sentiment.
- Sustainability accolades for both, including LVS's ESG report exceeding goals and MLCO's MICHELIN and S&P recognitions, highlight long-term operational strengths.
Introduction
Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) and Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) are prominent players in the global casino and integrated resorts industry, with significant exposure to the recovering Macau gaming market and broader tourism trends. This LVS vs. MLCO stock comparison evaluates their recent performance, financial metrics, and market positioning. Traders seeking momentum in gaming stocks and investors eyeing relative value in a volatile sector will find insights into growth drivers, risks, and sentiment shifts. As Macau visitor numbers rebound and U.S. operations stabilize, understanding these contrasts aids informed relative performance analysis.
LVS Overview and Recent Performance
Las Vegas Sands Corp. (LVS) operates luxury integrated resorts including The Venetian in Las Vegas, Marina Bay Sands in Singapore, and properties in Macau. In recent market activity, LVS shares have shown resilience, trading around $57 with a 52-week range of $32.83 to $70.45. Year-to-date gains near 11.7% and one-year returns over 78% reflect strong momentum driven by robust revenue growth of 26% year-over-year in the latest quarter. Sentiment has been bolstered by the release of its 2025 ESG report surpassing emissions reduction goals by 54%, leadership transitions including Patrick Dumont as CEO, and anticipation for Q1 2026 earnings. High debt levels (debt-to-equity at 829%) remain a watchpoint, but solid EBITDA of $4.53 billion supports stability.
MLCO Overview and Recent Performance
Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) focuses on casino resorts primarily in Macau (City of Dreams), the Philippines, and Cyprus. Shares hover near $5.93, within a 52-week range of $4.74 to $10.15, amid one-month gains around 7.8% but YTD pressures near -21% in some views. Revenue reached $5.16 billion trailing twelve months (TTM), with 8.6% quarterly growth, though profit margins lag at 3.6%. Recent weeks feature analyst target adjustments from Morgan Stanley on EBITDA outlook, sustainability honors like top MICHELIN Guide results and S&P Global Yearbook inclusion, and ADR trading volatility. Elevated enterprise value relative to market cap underscores debt at $7.03 billion, influencing cautious sentiment despite lower P/E valuation.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 351 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies—from short-term signal agents (1-day holds) to longer-term trend followers (up to 55 days)—with impressive stats like annualized returns ranging +15.5% to +167.8%, win rates of 53.9% to 87.7%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Selected for current market conditions, including volatility in sectors like semiconductors and energy, they offer real-time signals for copy trading without minimum balances on many. Explore these high-performing, AI-driven tools tailored to today’s trends.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both LVS and MLCO thrive on gaming revenue from Macau, but LVS diversifies with U.S. and Singapore assets, reducing regional risk compared to MLCO's heavier Asia reliance. Growth drivers include tourism rebound for both, yet LVS shows superior recent momentum (78% one-year return) and revenue scale ($13B TTM vs. $5B). MLCO offers value via lower P/E and PEG (0.45), but trails in profitability and ROE (73% for LVS). Risks encompass regulatory shifts in China and high leverage (both over 800% debt/equity for LVS). Market sentiment favors LVS pre-earnings, while MLCO draws interest from valuation plays.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward LVS based on consistent upward trends, stronger relative performance, robust profitability metrics, and positive catalysts like impending earnings. While MLCO presents attractive valuation, its higher volatility and regional concentration introduce greater uncertainty. This positioning suggests higher probability of near-term outperformance for LVS in the current market environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is LVS is a Buy and MLCO is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
LVS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMLCO’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- LVS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MLCO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
LVS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MLCO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- LVS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MLCO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
LVS (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -2.07% price change this week, while MLCO (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -8.57% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +2.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.03%.
Reported Earning Dates
LVS is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.
MLCO is expected to report earnings on Aug 19, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+2.91% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| LVS | MLCO | LVS / MLCO | |
| Capitalization | 33B | 2.11B | 1,563% |
| EBITDA | 4.79B | 1.21B | 398% |
| Gain YTD | -22.737 | -28.137 | 81% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.35 | 9.40 | 195% |
| Revenue | 13.7B | 5.3B | 259% |
| Total Cash | 3.33B | 942M | 354% |
| Total Debt | 15.7B | 6.94B | 226% |
LVS | MLCO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 53 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 63 Fair valued | 95 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 61 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LVS's Valuation (63) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as MLCO (95). This means that LVS’s stock grew similarly to MLCO’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as MLCO (100). This means that LVS’s stock grew similarly to MLCO’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's SMR Rating (13) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for MLCO (100). This means that LVS’s stock grew significantly faster than MLCO’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as MLCO (61). This means that LVS’s stock grew similarly to MLCO’s over the last 12 months.
LVS's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as MLCO (99). This means that LVS’s stock grew similarly to MLCO’s over the last 12 months.
| LVS | MLCO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 66% | 13 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 73% | 1 day ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 78% |
Advertisement
LVS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LVS has been closely correlated with WYNN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LVS jumps, then WYNN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LVS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LVS | 100% | -1.84% | ||
| WYNN - LVS | 66% Closely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| MLCO - LVS | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| MGM - LVS | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| BRSL - LVS | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.53% | ||
| INSE - LVS | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.17% | ||
More | ||||
MLCO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MLCO has been loosely correlated with WYNN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MLCO jumps, then WYNN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MLCO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLCO | 100% | -1.09% | ||
| WYNN - MLCO | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.22% | ||
| LVS - MLCO | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.84% | ||
| MGM - MLCO | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.71% | ||
| HGV - MLCO | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| DKNG - MLCO | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.72% | ||
More | ||||