Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMAZX vs TRIGX
GMAZX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts GMAZX vs TRIGX
GMAZX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.3B vs. GMAZX (331M). GMAZX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: GMAZX (4.15) vs TRIGX (2.38). GMAZX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: GMAZX (3 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.81) is less costly to investors than GMAZX (0.70). GMAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMAZX: TRIGX (2500) vs GMAZX (125000000). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.10 vs. GMAZX (14.81).
| GMAZX | TRIGX | GMAZX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 0.81 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.81 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.010 | 7.696 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 125000000 | 2500 | 5,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 331M | 16.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.15 | 2.38 | 175% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.81 | 25.10 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 80.77 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 76.71 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 150.62 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement