Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMAZX vs TRIGX
GMAZX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts GMAZX vs TRIGX
GMAZX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17.3B vs. GMAZX (531M). GMAZX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: GMAZX (2.97) vs TRIGX (2.29). GMAZX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: GMAZX (3 years) vs TRIGX (28 years). TRIGX (0.81) is less costly to investors than GMAZX (0.72). GMAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMAZX: TRIGX (2500) vs GMAZX (125000000). TRIGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.11 vs. GMAZX (16.54).
| GMAZX | TRIGX | GMAZX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.81 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.81 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.072 | 17.283 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 125000000 | 2500 | 5,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 531M | 17.3B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.97 | 2.29 | 130% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.54 | 30.11 | 55% |
| Returns for 3 years | N/A | 91.49 | - |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 96.85 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 157.07 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement