GMBLP
Price
$0.08
Change
+$0.02 (+33.33%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
VAC
Price
$53.47
Change
+$0.64 (+1.21%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
3.79B
25 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GMBLP vs VAC

Header iconGMBLP vs VAC Comparison
Open Charts GMBLP vs VACBanner chart's image
Esports Entertainment Group
Price$0.08
Change+$0.02 (+33.33%)
Volume$330
CapitalizationN/A
MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE
Price$53.47
Change+$0.64 (+1.21%)
Volume$480.2K
Capitalization3.79B
GMBLP vs VAC Comparison Chart
Loading...
VAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GMBLP vs. VAC commentary
Apr 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMBLP is a StrongBuy and VAC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 12, 2025
Stock price -- (GMBLP: $0.08 vs. VAC: $53.47)
Brand notoriety: GMBLP and VAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GMBLP: 15% vs. VAC: 79%
Market capitalization -- GMBLP: $0 vs. VAC: $3.79B
GMBLP [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $0. VAC’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $3.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GMBLP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVAC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GMBLP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GMBLP is a better buy in the long-term than VAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

VAC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • VAC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

GMBLP (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +32.47% price change this week, while VAC (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -2.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -9.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

VAC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+0.57% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMBLP YTD gains are higher at: 57.692 vs. VAC (-39.787). VAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 678M vs. GMBLP (-25.74M). VAC has more cash in the bank: 248M vs. GMBLP (303K). GMBLP has less debt than VAC: GMBLP (70.4K) vs VAC (5.15B). VAC has higher revenues than GMBLP: VAC (4.73B) vs GMBLP (16.1M).
GMBLPVACGMBLP / VAC
CapitalizationN/A3.79B-
EBITDA-25.74M678M-4%
Gain YTD57.692-39.787-145%
P/E RatioN/A17.07-
Revenue16.1M4.73B0%
Total Cash303K248M0%
Total Debt70.4K5.15B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VAC: Fundamental Ratings
VAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
56
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80
SMR RATING
1..100
71
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
89
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
87
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
34

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
VAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
VAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JPEF61.341.04
+1.72%
JPMorgan Equity Focus ETF
NCEGX18.58N/A
N/A
The North Country Large Cap Equity Fund
CNYHKD1.06N/A
N/A
China Yuan - Hong Kong Dollar
GBPNZD2.26N/A
N/A
United Kingdom Pound - New Zealand Dollar
NZDAUD0.92N/A
N/A
New Zealand Dollar - Australian Dollar

GMBLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMBLP and CPHC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMBLP and CPHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMBLP
1D Price
Change %
GMBLP100%
+32.47%
CPHC - GMBLP
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
CNTY - GMBLP
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.11%
CZR - GMBLP
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.47%
VAC - GMBLP
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.21%
LTRY - GMBLP
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.85%
More

VAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VAC has been closely correlated with HGV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VAC jumps, then HGV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VAC
1D Price
Change %
VAC100%
+1.21%
HGV - VAC
75%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
MGM - VAC
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.09%
RRR - VAC
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
GDEN - VAC
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
BYD - VAC
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
More