GMBLP
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.06 (-40.00%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
VAC
Price
$66.01
Change
+$0.99 (+1.52%)
Updated
Jun 6, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.79B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

GMBLP vs VAC

Header iconGMBLP vs VAC Comparison
Open Charts GMBLP vs VACBanner chart's image
Esports Entertainment Group
Price$0.09
Change-$0.06 (-40.00%)
Volume$1.28K
CapitalizationN/A
MARRIOTT VACATIONS WORLDWIDE
Price$66.01
Change+$0.99 (+1.52%)
Volume$5.15K
Capitalization3.79B
GMBLP vs VAC Comparison Chart
Loading...
VAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GMBLP vs. VAC commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMBLP is a Buy and VAC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (GMBLP: $0.09 vs. VAC: $66.04)
Brand notoriety: GMBLP and VAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GMBLP: 93% vs. VAC: 61%
Market capitalization -- GMBLP: $0 vs. VAC: $3.79B
GMBLP [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $0. VAC’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $3.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GMBLP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVAC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GMBLP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • VAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GMBLP is a better buy in the long-term than VAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

VAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • VAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

GMBLP (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -40.00% price change this week, while VAC (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +0.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +19.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.66%.

Reported Earning Dates

VAC is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-1.03% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GMBLP YTD gains are higher at: 73.077 vs. VAC (-24.753). VAC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 678M vs. GMBLP (-25.74M). VAC has more cash in the bank: 248M vs. GMBLP (303K). GMBLP has less debt than VAC: GMBLP (70.4K) vs VAC (5.15B). VAC has higher revenues than GMBLP: VAC (4.73B) vs GMBLP (16.1M).
GMBLPVACGMBLP / VAC
CapitalizationN/A3.79B-
EBITDA-25.74M678M-4%
Gain YTD73.077-24.753-295%
P/E RatioN/A17.07-
Revenue16.1M4.73B0%
Total Cash303K248M0%
Total Debt70.4K5.15B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VAC: Fundamental Ratings
VAC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
68
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
70
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
86
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
VAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
VAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PPUMX12.81N/A
N/A
Principal LargeCap Growth I R3
FRBRX123.82N/A
N/A
Franklin Biotechnology Discovery R6
SRUIX13.81N/A
N/A
Meeder Spectrum Institutional
LOFLX13.74N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Focused Large Cap Value F3
VLMIX35.04-0.09
-0.26%
Value Line Mid Cap Focused Institutional

GMBLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GMBLP and CPHC have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMBLP and CPHC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMBLP
1D Price
Change %
GMBLP100%
N/A
CPHC - GMBLP
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNTY - GMBLP
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.99%
CZR - GMBLP
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.08%
VAC - GMBLP
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
LTRY - GMBLP
5%
Poorly correlated
-7.67%
More