Advertisement
HGV vs VAC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGV is a Hold and VAC is a Buy.
HGV | VAC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 35 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
VAC's Valuation (13) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HGV (61) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that VAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HGV’s over the last 12 months.
VAC's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as HGV (100) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that VAC’s stock grew similarly to HGV’s over the last 12 months.
HGV's SMR Rating (65) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as VAC (94) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that HGV’s stock grew similarly to VAC’s over the last 12 months.
VAC's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HGV (80) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that VAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HGV’s over the last 12 months.
VAC's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HGV (98) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that VAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HGV’s over the last 12 months.
| HGV | VAC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 1 day ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 16 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 81% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HGV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while VAC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- HGV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- VAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HGV’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VAC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HGV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- VAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
HGV (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -2.64% price change this week, while VAC (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +1.42% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -2.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.93%.
Reported Earning Dates
HGV is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
VAC is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-2.77% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PLUL | 6.05 | 0.11 | +1.80% |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long PLUG Daily ETF (PLUL) | |||
| OPER | 100.10 | 0.03 | +0.02% |
| ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF (OPER) | |||
| ASHS | 40.33 | -0.21 | -0.52% |
| Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 China A-Shares Small Cap ETF (ASHS) | |||
| PFLD | 19.08 | -0.10 | -0.52% |
| AAM Low Duration Preferred and Income Securities ETF (PFLD) | |||
| URNM | 47.46 | -0.79 | -1.64% |
| Sprott Uranium Miners ETF (URNM) | |||
HGV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HGV has been loosely correlated with VAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HGV jumps, then VAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HGV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HGV | 100% | -3.13% | ||
| VAC - HGV | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.29% | ||
| INSE - HGV | 52% Loosely correlated | +4.56% | ||
| BYD - HGV | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| DKNG - HGV | 43% Loosely correlated | -3.01% | ||
| CHDN - HGV | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.63% | ||
More | ||||
VAC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VAC has been loosely correlated with INSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VAC jumps, then INSE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To VAC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAC | 100% | -2.29% | ||
| INSE - VAC | 61% Loosely correlated | +4.56% | ||
| HGV - VAC | 56% Loosely correlated | -3.13% | ||
| PENN - VAC | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| ACEL - VAC | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
| DKNG - VAC | 43% Loosely correlated | -3.01% | ||
More | ||||