Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMCFX vs TRIGX
GMCFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts GMCFX vs TRIGX
GMO International Equity IV
Price$32.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets954.46M
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq
Price$23.13
Change-$0.03 (-0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets16.58B
GMCFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMCFX vs. TRIGX commentary
Oct 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMCFX is a Hold and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 16.6B vs. GMCFX (954M). GMCFX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: GMCFX (2.82) vs TRIGX (1.91). GMCFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: GMCFX (28 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.87) is less costly to investors than GMCFX (0.67). GMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. TRIGX (15.90). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMCFX: TRIGX (2500) vs GMCFX (125000000). GMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.43 vs. TRIGX (27.73). TRIGX (109.05) and GMCFX (104.44) have equivalent 5 years return.
| GMCFX | TRIGX | GMCFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.87 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.87 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.764 | 36.315 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 125000000 | 2500 | 5,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 954M | 16.6B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.82 | 1.91 | 147% |
| Returns for 1 year | 30.43 | 27.73 | 110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 110.09 | 106.63 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 104.44 | 109.05 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | 132.46 | 101.67 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement