Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMCFX vs TRIGX
GMCFX vs TRIGX Comparison
Open Charts GMCFX vs TRIGX
GMCFX vs TRIGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMCFX vs. TRIGX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMCFX is a Buy and TRIGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRIGX has more cash in the bank: 17.1B vs. GMCFX (1.41B). GMCFX pays higher dividends than TRIGX: GMCFX (4.79) vs TRIGX (2.38). GMCFX was incepted earlier than TRIGX: GMCFX (28 years) vs TRIGX (27 years). TRIGX (0.81) is less costly to investors than GMCFX (0.67). GMCFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. TRIGX (15.00). TRIGX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMCFX: TRIGX (2500) vs GMCFX (125000000). GMCFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 40.79 vs. TRIGX (29.34). GMCFX return over 5 years is better than : 100.23 vs. TRIGX (83.31).
| GMCFX | TRIGX | GMCFX / TRIGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.81 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.81 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.572 | 10.976 | 169% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 125000000 | 2500 | 5,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.41B | 17.1B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.79 | 2.38 | 201% |
| Returns for 1 year | 40.79 | 29.34 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 115.91 | 88.12 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.23 | 83.31 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 217.93 | 148.81 | 146% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers