Advertisement
GMED vs SRTS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMED is a Hold and SRTS is a Hold.
GMED | SRTS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 76 Overvalued | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 74 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 54 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SRTS's Valuation (67) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as GMED (76). This means that SRTS’s stock grew similarly to GMED’s over the last 12 months.
SRTS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as GMED (100). This means that SRTS’s stock grew similarly to GMED’s over the last 12 months.
GMED's SMR Rating (65) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as SRTS (97). This means that GMED’s stock grew similarly to SRTS’s over the last 12 months.
GMED's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as SRTS (74). This means that GMED’s stock grew similarly to SRTS’s over the last 12 months.
SRTS's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Medical Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMED (54). This means that SRTS’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMED’s over the last 12 months.
| GMED | SRTS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 84% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GMED’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while SRTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- GMED’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SRTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GMED’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRTS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- GMED’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SRTS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
GMED (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +0.19% price change this week, while SRTS (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +1.37% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
GMED is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
SRTS is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical/Nursing Services (-1.96% weekly)The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DDSQ | 21.48 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator Equity Dual Directional 5 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (DDSQ) | |||
| ZCBE | 49.08 | N/A | N/A |
| Global X Zero Coupon Bond 2033 ETF (ZCBE) | |||
| VBCJ | 70.82 | -0.11 | -0.15% |
| Vanguard Target Maturity 2036 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCJ) | |||
| SEIE | 35.35 | -0.44 | -1.24% |
| SEI Select International Equity ETF (SEIE) | |||
| PTH | 59.66 | -1.10 | -1.81% |
| Invesco Dorsey Wright Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) | |||
GMED and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMED has been loosely correlated with TMCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMED jumps, then TMCI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMED | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMED | 100% | -0.65% | ||
| TMCI - GMED | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| TNDM - GMED | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| MDT - GMED | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.17% | ||
| SYK - GMED | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| ILMN - GMED | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.90% | ||
More | ||||
SRTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SRTS has been loosely correlated with LUNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SRTS jumps, then LUNG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SRTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SRTS | 100% | -1.34% | ||
| LUNG - SRTS | 57% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| HAE - SRTS | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| AORT - SRTS | 35% Loosely correlated | -3.90% | ||
| GMED - SRTS | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| MTD - SRTS | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.97% | ||
More | ||||