Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMEMX vs RNWAX
GMEMX vs RNWAX Comparison
Open Charts GMEMX vs RNWAX
GMEMX vs RNWAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMEMX vs. RNWAX commentary
Jul 01, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMEMX is a Hold and RNWAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWAX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. GMEMX (575M). GMEMX pays higher dividends than RNWAX: GMEMX (3.71) vs RNWAX (0.49). GMEMX was incepted earlier than RNWAX: GMEMX (30 years) vs RNWAX (24 years). RNWAX (1.66) is less costly to investors than GMEMX (1.13). GMEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. RNWAX (46.00). RNWAX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMEMX: RNWAX (250) vs GMEMX (1000000). GMEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.11 vs. RNWAX (22.31). GMEMX return over 5 years is better than : 36.22 vs. RNWAX (12.42).
| GMEMX | RNWAX | GMEMX / RNWAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 1.66 | 62% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.66 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 34.140 | 16.021 | 213% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 575M | 90.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.71 | 0.49 | 761% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.11 | 22.31 | 247% |
| Returns for 3 years | 109.48 | 47.26 | 232% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.22 | 12.42 | 292% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.57 | 109.96 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement