Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMEMX vs RNWFX
GMEMX vs RNWFX Comparison
Open Charts GMEMX vs RNWFX
GMEMX vs RNWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMEMX vs. RNWFX commentary
Jun 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMEMX is a Hold and RNWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWFX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. GMEMX (559M). GMEMX pays higher dividends than RNWFX: GMEMX (3.71) vs RNWFX (1.20). GMEMX was incepted earlier than RNWFX: GMEMX (30 years) vs RNWFX (24 years). GMEMX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RNWFX (0.62). GMEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. RNWFX (46.00). RNWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMEMX: RNWFX (250) vs GMEMX (1000000). GMEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.22 vs. RNWFX (22.91). GMEMX return over 5 years is better than : 31.60 vs. RNWFX (14.45).
| GMEMX | RNWFX | GMEMX / RNWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.62 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.62 | 182% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.220 | 12.444 | 267% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 559M | 90.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.71 | 1.20 | 310% |
| Returns for 1 year | 57.22 | 22.91 | 250% |
| Returns for 3 years | 103.69 | 50.30 | 206% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.60 | 14.45 | 219% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.66 | 116.85 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement