Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMEMX vs RNWHX
GMEMX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts GMEMX vs RNWHX
GMEMX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMEMX vs. RNWHX commentary
Jun 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMEMX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 90.9B vs. GMEMX (559M). GMEMX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: GMEMX (3.71) vs RNWHX (1.15). GMEMX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: GMEMX (30 years) vs RNWHX (11 years). GMEMX (1.13) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). GMEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 91.00 vs. RNWHX (46.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMEMX: RNWHX (250) vs GMEMX (1000000). GMEMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 57.22 vs. RNWHX (22.70). GMEMX return over 5 years is better than : 31.60 vs. RNWHX (13.71).
| GMEMX | RNWHX | GMEMX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.72 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 0.72 | 157% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.220 | 12.401 | 268% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 559M | 90.9B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.71 | 1.15 | 323% |
| Returns for 1 year | 57.22 | 22.70 | 252% |
| Returns for 3 years | 103.69 | 49.65 | 209% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.60 | 13.71 | 230% |
| Returns for 10 years | 129.66 | 113.94 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement