It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GMM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNABL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GMM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NABL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
GMM (@Information Technology Services) experienced а -20.38% price change this week, while NABL (@Information Technology Services) price change was +6.56% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -4.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +58.85%.
NABL is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.
| GMM | NABL | GMM / NABL | |
| Capitalization | 5.72M | 612M | 1% |
| EBITDA | -6.18M | 91.9M | -7% |
| Gain YTD | -95.034 | -56.551 | 168% |
| P/E Ratio | 0.90 | 770.00 | 0% |
| Revenue | 55.9M | 527M | 11% |
| Total Cash | 1.17M | 118M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 3.69M | 436M | 1% |
GMM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GMM | NABL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 82% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 16 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 74% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that GMM and KD have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GMM and KD's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMM | 100% | +3.17% | ||
| KD - GMM | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| EFOR - GMM | 22% Poorly correlated | +2.29% | ||
| NABL - GMM | 22% Poorly correlated | +3.50% | ||
| INGM - GMM | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.47% | ||
| CTSH - GMM | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.20% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NABL has been loosely correlated with AI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NABL jumps, then AI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NABL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NABL | 100% | +3.50% | ||
| AI - NABL | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.72% | ||
| DXC - NABL | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
| PSFE - NABL | 52% Loosely correlated | +3.05% | ||
| FLYW - NABL | 52% Loosely correlated | +5.96% | ||
| EPAM - NABL | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.95% | ||
More | ||||