GMPXF
Price
$8.03
Change
+$1.04 (+14.88%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
216.03M
SLFPY
Price
$10.78
Change
+$0.74 (+7.37%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
5.79B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GMPXF vs SLFPY

Header iconGMPXF vs SLFPY Comparison
Open Charts GMPXF vs SLFPYBanner chart's image
RF Capital Group
Price$8.03
Change+$1.04 (+14.88%)
Volume$100
Capitalization216.03M
Aberdeen Group
Price$10.78
Change+$0.74 (+7.37%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization5.79B
GMPXF vs SLFPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GMPXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLFPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GMPXF vs. SLFPY commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMPXF is a Hold and SLFPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (GMPXF: $8.03 vs. SLFPY: $10.78)
Brand notoriety: GMPXF and SLFPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GMPXF: 58% vs. SLFPY: 106%
Market capitalization -- GMPXF: $216.03M vs. SLFPY: $5.79B
GMPXF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $216.03M. SLFPY’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GMPXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLFPY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GMPXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLFPY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLFPY is a better buy in the long-term than GMPXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GMPXF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLFPY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GMPXF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SLFPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLFPY is a better buy in the short-term than GMPXF.

Price Growth

GMPXF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +30.78% price change this week, while SLFPY (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

GMPXF is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.

SLFPY is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLFPY($5.79B) has a higher market cap than GMPXF($216M). GMPXF has higher P/E ratio than SLFPY: GMPXF (14.12) vs SLFPY (7.89). SLFPY YTD gains are higher at: 59.491 vs. GMPXF (56.226). SLFPY has higher revenues than GMPXF: SLFPY (2.31B) vs GMPXF (214M).
GMPXFSLFPYGMPXF / SLFPY
Capitalization216M5.79B4%
EBITDA52.7MN/A-
Gain YTD56.22659.49195%
P/E Ratio14.127.89179%
Revenue214M2.31B9%
Total Cash571MN/A-
Total Debt120MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GMPXF vs SLFPY: Fundamental Ratings
GMPXF
SLFPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10087
SMR RATING
1..100
9052
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3839
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLFPY's Valuation (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GMPXF (84). This means that SLFPY’s stock grew significantly faster than GMPXF’s over the last 12 months.

SLFPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as GMPXF (100). This means that SLFPY’s stock grew similarly to GMPXF’s over the last 12 months.

SLFPY's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GMPXF (90). This means that SLFPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GMPXF’s over the last 12 months.

GMPXF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as SLFPY (39). This means that GMPXF’s stock grew similarly to SLFPY’s over the last 12 months.

GMPXF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as SLFPY (100). This means that GMPXF’s stock grew similarly to SLFPY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GMPXFSLFPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GMPXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLFPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PFI57.050.90
+1.60%
Invesco Dorsey Wright Financial Momt ETF
IMRA50.440.49
+0.98%
Bitwise MARA Option Income Strategy ETF
VALQ63.280.24
+0.38%
American Century® U.S. Quality Value ETF
UYLD51.10N/A
N/A
Angel Oak UltraShort Income ETF
MAPP23.86N/A
N/A
Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF

GMPXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMPXF has been loosely correlated with LBGUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GMPXF jumps, then LBGUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GMPXF
1D Price
Change %
GMPXF100%
+14.88%
LBGUF - GMPXF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RAFI - GMPXF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.31%
BBUC - GMPXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.67%
SLFPY - GMPXF
21%
Poorly correlated
+7.36%
KKR - GMPXF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.03%
More

SLFPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLFPY and SLFPF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLFPY and SLFPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLFPY
1D Price
Change %
SLFPY100%
+7.36%
SLFPF - SLFPY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OWL - SLFPY
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
BLK - SLFPY
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
FNCSF - SLFPY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNS - SLFPY
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
More