Ad is loading...
GMRAX vs NAESX
GMRAX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts GMRAX vs NAESX
Nationwide Small Cap Index A
Price$10.67
Change+$0.19 (+1.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.64M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$107.04
Change+$1.67 (+1.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets139.54B
GMRAX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMRAX vs. NAESX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMRAX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 140B vs. GMRAX (206M). GMRAX pays higher dividends than NAESX: GMRAX (1.52) vs NAESX (1.43). GMRAX was incepted earlier than NAESX: GMRAX (25 years) vs NAESX (65 years). GMRAX (0.72) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). GMRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.50 vs. NAESX (13.00). GMRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: GMRAX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.09 vs. GMRAX (-5.81). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 65.08 vs. GMRAX (38.74).
| GMRAX | NAESX | GMRAX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.17 | 400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.17 | 424% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.580 | -8.414 | 126% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 206M | 140B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.52 | 1.43 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.81 | -0.09 | 6,375% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.44 | 20.27 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.74 | 65.08 | 60% |
| Returns for 10 years | -27.10 | 87.81 | -31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...