Ad is loading...
GMRAX vs NAESX
GMRAX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts GMRAX vs NAESX
Nationwide Small Cap Index A
Price$9.81
Change-$0.10 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets195.15M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$98.41
Change-$1.16 (-1.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
GMRAX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMRAX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMRAX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. GMRAX (195M). GMRAX pays higher dividends than NAESX: GMRAX (1.49) vs NAESX (1.39). GMRAX was incepted earlier than NAESX: GMRAX (25 years) vs NAESX (65 years). GMRAX (0.72) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). GMRAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.43 vs. NAESX (12.00). GMRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: GMRAX (2000) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.03 vs. GMRAX (-6.97). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 68.67 vs. GMRAX (42.11).
| GMRAX | NAESX | GMRAX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.68 | 0.17 | 400% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.17 | 424% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -15.444 | -13.455 | 115% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 195M | 143B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.39 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.97 | -2.03 | 343% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.22 | 1.12 | -734% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.11 | 68.67 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | -31.95 | 76.65 | -42% |