Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMRAX vs NAESX
GMRAX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts GMRAX vs NAESX
GMRAX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMRAX vs. NAESX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMRAX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 185B vs. GMRAX (270M). NAESX pays higher dividends than GMRAX: NAESX (1.09) vs GMRAX (0.33). GMRAX was incepted earlier than NAESX: GMRAX (27 years) vs NAESX (66 years). GMRAX (0.72) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. GMRAX (14.57). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMRAX: NAESX (0) vs GMRAX (2000). GMRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.82 vs. NAESX (13.09). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 32.77 vs. GMRAX (18.43).
| GMRAX | NAESX | GMRAX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.17 | 394% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.17 | 424% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.986 | 12.982 | 131% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 270M | 185B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.33 | 1.09 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.82 | 13.09 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.90 | 49.57 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.43 | 32.77 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.22 | 152.60 | 12% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers