Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMRAX vs NAESX
GMRAX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts GMRAX vs NAESX
GMRAX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMRAX vs. NAESX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMRAX is a Hold and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 177B vs. GMRAX (272M). NAESX pays higher dividends than GMRAX: NAESX (1.08) vs GMRAX (0.32). GMRAX was incepted earlier than NAESX: GMRAX (26 years) vs NAESX (66 years). GMRAX (0.72) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). NAESX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.00 vs. GMRAX (14.57). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than GMRAX: NAESX (0) vs GMRAX (2000). GMRAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 38.60 vs. NAESX (28.95). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 33.38 vs. GMRAX (16.15).
| GMRAX | NAESX | GMRAX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.17 | 394% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.72 | 0.17 | 424% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.340 | 13.680 | 127% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 272M | 177B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.32 | 1.08 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | 38.60 | 28.95 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.60 | 54.86 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 16.15 | 33.38 | 48% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.69 | 160.50 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement