Ad is loading...
GMSMX vs NAESX
GMSMX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts GMSMX vs NAESX
GuideMark® Small/Mid Cap Core Service
Price$17.55
Change+$0.36 (+2.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets85.82M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$103.13
Change+$2.17 (+2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets143.36B
GMSMX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMSMX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMSMX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. GMSMX (85.8M). NAESX pays higher dividends than GMSMX: NAESX (1.39) vs GMSMX (0.44). GMSMX was incepted earlier than NAESX: GMSMX (24 years) vs NAESX (65 years). GMSMX (1.16) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). GMSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.37 vs. NAESX (12.00). GMSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than NAESX: GMSMX (0) vs NAESX (3000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.36 vs. GMSMX (-10.57). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 71.57 vs. GMSMX (50.02).
| GMSMX | NAESX | GMSMX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.17 | 682% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.16 | 0.17 | 682% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.981 | -12.247 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 85.8M | 143B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.44 | 1.39 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.57 | -2.36 | 448% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.33 | 4.67 | -114% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.02 | 71.57 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.82 | 78.60 | 1% |