Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GMSMX vs NAESX
GMSMX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts GMSMX vs NAESX
GMSMX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GMSMX vs. NAESX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GMSMX is a Hold and NAESX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 189B vs. GMSMX (101M). NAESX pays higher dividends than GMSMX: NAESX (1.10) vs GMSMX (0.29). GMSMX was incepted earlier than NAESX: GMSMX (25 years) vs NAESX (66 years). GMSMX (1.15) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). GMSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. NAESX (17.00). GMSMX (0) and NAESX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 22.56 vs. GMSMX (20.23). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 34.95 vs. GMSMX (9.28).
| GMSMX | NAESX | GMSMX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.17 | 676% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.17 | 676% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 66 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 19.233 | 14.563 | 132% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 101M | 189B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.29 | 1.10 | 27% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.23 | 22.56 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.93 | 43.30 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.28 | 34.95 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.64 | 155.28 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement