GNENF
Price
$2.35
Change
-$0.06 (-2.49%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
16.15B
SQM
Price
$34.01
Change
+$0.05 (+0.15%)
Updated
May 2 closing price
Capitalization
13.99B
12 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GNENF vs SQM

Header iconGNENF vs SQM Comparison
Open Charts GNENF vs SQMBanner chart's image
Ganfeng Lithium Group
Price$2.35
Change-$0.06 (-2.49%)
Volume$2.4K
Capitalization16.15B
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA
Price$34.01
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
Volume$685.3K
Capitalization13.99B
GNENF vs SQM Comparison Chart
Loading...
SQM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GNENF vs. SQM commentary
May 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GNENF is a Hold and SQM is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 04, 2025
Stock price -- (GNENF: $2.35 vs. SQM: $34.01)
Brand notoriety: GNENF and SQM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GNENF: 59% vs. SQM: 53%
Market capitalization -- GNENF: $16.15B vs. SQM: $13.99B
GNENF [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $16.15B. SQM’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $13.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GNENF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSQM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GNENF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SQM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both GNENF and SQM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SQM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SQM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

GNENF (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +0.34% price change this week, while SQM (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -5.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

GNENF is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.

SQM is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+1.77% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNENF($16.2B) has a higher market cap than SQM($14B). SQM has higher P/E ratio than GNENF: SQM (6.95) vs GNENF (4.79). SQM YTD gains are higher at: -6.463 vs. GNENF (-10.816). GNENF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 21.6B vs. SQM (2.94B). GNENF has more cash in the bank: 9.1B vs. SQM (2.36B). SQM has less debt than GNENF: SQM (4.49B) vs GNENF (18.1B). GNENF has higher revenues than SQM: GNENF (45.9B) vs SQM (7.47B).
GNENFSQMGNENF / SQM
Capitalization16.2B14B116%
EBITDA21.6B2.94B736%
Gain YTD-10.816-6.463167%
P/E Ratio4.796.9569%
Revenue45.9B7.47B615%
Total Cash9.1B2.36B386%
Total Debt18.1B4.49B403%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GNENF vs SQM: Fundamental Ratings
GNENF
SQM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
555
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10075
SMR RATING
1..100
9191
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7782
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
111
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4850

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GNENF's Valuation (90) in the null industry is in the same range as SQM (92) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that GNENF’s stock grew similarly to SQM’s over the last 12 months.

SQM's Profit vs Risk Rating (75) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as GNENF (100) in the null industry. This means that SQM’s stock grew similarly to GNENF’s over the last 12 months.

SQM's SMR Rating (91) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as GNENF (91) in the null industry. This means that SQM’s stock grew similarly to GNENF’s over the last 12 months.

GNENF's Price Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as SQM (82) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry. This means that GNENF’s stock grew similarly to SQM’s over the last 12 months.

SQM's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Chemicals Agricultural industry is in the same range as GNENF (11) in the null industry. This means that SQM’s stock grew similarly to GNENF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SQM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SQM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFVEX25.870.47
+1.85%
DFA US Vector Equity I
ECEIX10.980.18
+1.67%
Lazard Emerging Markets Core Equity Inst
WVMIX10.74N/A
N/A
William Blair Mid Cap Value I
FAUFX44.72N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Utilities M
SMYFX11.74N/A
N/A
SEI Small Cap Y (SIMT)

GNENF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNENF has been loosely correlated with GNENY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GNENF jumps, then GNENY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNENF
1D Price
Change %
GNENF100%
-2.69%
GNENY - GNENF
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SQM - GNENF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.15%
ALB - GNENF
33%
Loosely correlated
+1.65%
BAK - GNENF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.79%
NDEKY - GNENF
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.35%
More

SQM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SQM has been closely correlated with ALB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SQM jumps, then ALB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SQM
1D Price
Change %
SQM100%
+0.15%
ALB - SQM
77%
Closely correlated
+1.65%
DOW - SQM
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.36%
OLN - SQM
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.54%
CC - SQM
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.46%
MEOH - SQM
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
More