Ad is loading...
GNR vs LITP
GNR vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts GNR vs LITP
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$53.09
Change-$0.43 (-0.80%)
Volume$243
Net Assets2.78B
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$5.91
Change-$0.04 (-0.67%)
Volume$1.16K
Net Assets13.35M
GNR vs LITP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GNR vs. LITP commentary
May 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GNR is a Buy and LITP is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 2.78B vs. LITP (13.3M). GNR has a higher annual dividend yield than LITP: GNR (7.576) vs LITP (-10.928). GNR was incepted earlier than LITP: GNR (15 years) vs LITP (2 years). GNR (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than LITP (0.65). LITP has a higher turnover GNR (15.00) vs GNR (15.00).
| GNR | LITP | GNR / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | 7.576 | -10.928 | -69% |
| Net Assets | 2.78B | 13.3M | 20,887% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.65 | 62% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 49.00 | 31% |
| Yield | 4.57 | 7.94 | 58% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GNR | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 84% | 14 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +0.85% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| LAR - LITP | 72% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | -2.09% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 66% Closely correlated | -3.49% | ||
More | ||||