Ad is loading...
GNR vs LITP
GNR vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts GNR vs LITP
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$53.29
Change-$1.04 (-1.91%)
Volume$74.2K
Net Assets2.79B
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$6.48
Change-$0.17 (-2.56%)
Volume$2.63K
Net Assets6.08M
GNR vs LITP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GNR vs. LITP commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GNR is a StrongBuy and LITP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 2.79B vs. LITP (6.08M). GNR has a higher annual dividend yield than LITP: GNR (7.094) vs LITP (-2.994). GNR was incepted earlier than LITP: GNR (14 years) vs LITP (2 years). LITP has a higher turnover GNR (15.00) vs GNR (15.00).
| GNR | LITP | GNR / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | 7.094 | -2.994 | -237% |
| Net Assets | 2.79B | 6.08M | 45,992% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 59.00 | 25% |
| Yield | 3.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GNR | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 83% | 13 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -2.56% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | -4.12% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.95% | ||
More | ||||