Ad is loading...
Ad is loading...
GNR vs LITP
GNR vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts GNR vs LITP
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$55.08
Change+$0.13 (+0.24%)
Volume$160
CapitalizationN/A
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$8.38
Change-$0.08 (-0.95%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
GNR vs LITP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GNR vs. LITP commentary
Nov 22, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GNR is a StrongBuy and LITP is a StrongSell.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 2.93B vs. LITP (7.34M). GNR has a higher annual dividend yield than LITP: GNR (-1.370) vs LITP (-32.866). GNR was incepted earlier than LITP: GNR (14 years) vs LITP (2 years). LITP has a higher turnover GNR (15.00) vs GNR (15.00).
| GNR | LITP | GNR / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | -1.370 | -32.866 | 4% |
| Net Assets | 2.93B | 7.34M | 39,907% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 59.00 | 25% |
| Yield | 3.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GNR | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 85% | 8 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | +2.30% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +15.09% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | +6.30% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
More | ||||