GNR | LITP | GNR / LITP | |
Gain YTD | 13.065 | 25.984 | 50% |
Net Assets | 3.26B | 19M | 17,158% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.65 | 62% |
Turnover | 15.00 | 49.00 | 31% |
Yield | 3.90 | 6.71 | 58% |
Fund Existence | 15 years | 3 years | - |
GNR | LITP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago76% | 1 day ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago85% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago81% | 1 day ago89% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago86% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago82% | 1 day ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago83% | 13 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago85% | 1 day ago84% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LITP | 100% | +14.11% | ||
SQM - LITP | 76% Closely correlated | +8.72% | ||
ALB - LITP | 74% Closely correlated | +7.00% | ||
SGML - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +22.79% | ||
LAR - LITP | 70% Closely correlated | +36.43% | ||
LAC - LITP | 63% Loosely correlated | +9.32% | ||
More |