GNR | LITP | GNR / LITP | |
Gain YTD | 20.180 | 17.522 | 115% |
Net Assets | 3.33B | 21.4M | 15,537% |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.65 | 62% |
Turnover | 15.00 | 49.00 | 31% |
Yield | 3.66 | 5.41 | 68% |
Fund Existence | 15 years | 3 years | - |
GNR | LITP | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 3 days ago89% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 2 days ago87% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago90% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 10 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago82% | 8 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago81% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LITP | 100% | -0.69% | ||
SQM - LITP | 75% Closely correlated | +0.41% | ||
ALB - LITP | 73% Closely correlated | -0.12% | ||
LAR - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
SGML - LITP | 67% Closely correlated | +1.55% | ||
LAC - LITP | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
More |