Ad is loading...
GNR vs LITP
GNR vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts GNR vs LITP
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$47.59
Change-$3.75 (-7.30%)
Volume$161
Net Assets2.74B
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$5.02
Change-$0.85 (-14.48%)
Volume$195
Net Assets12.87M
GNR vs LITP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GNR vs. LITP commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GNR is a Hold and LITP is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 2.74B vs. LITP (12.9M). GNR has a higher annual dividend yield than LITP: GNR (3.175) vs LITP (-12.126). GNR was incepted earlier than LITP: GNR (15 years) vs LITP (2 years). GNR (0.40) has a lower expense ratio than LITP (0.65). LITP has a higher turnover GNR (15.00) vs GNR (15.00).
| GNR | LITP | GNR / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | 3.175 | -12.126 | -26% |
| Net Assets | 2.74B | 12.9M | 21,233% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.65 | 62% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 59.00 | 25% |
| Yield | 4.43 | 7.37 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GNR | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 19 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | N/A | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.91% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -7.96% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | -5.75% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | -9.88% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 58% Loosely correlated | -2.17% | ||
More | ||||