Ad is loading...
GNR vs LITP
GNR vs LITP Comparison
Open Charts GNR vs LITP
SPDR® S&P Global Natural Resources ETF
Price$56.55
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$133.05K
CapitalizationN/A
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
Price$7.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14.16K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GNR vs LITP Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
GNR vs. LITP commentary
Sep 21, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GNR is a StrongBuy and LITP is a Sell.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNR has more net assets: 3.23B vs. LITP (5.67M). GNR has a higher annual dividend yield than LITP: GNR (-0.580) vs LITP (-45.178). GNR was incepted earlier than LITP: GNR (14 years) vs LITP (2 years). LITP has a higher turnover GNR (15.00) vs GNR (15.00).
| GNR | LITP | GNR / LITP | |
| Gain YTD | -0.580 | -45.178 | 1% |
| Net Assets | 3.23B | 5.67M | 56,936% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 59.00 | 25% |
| Yield | 3.30 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| GNR | LITP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
GNR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNR has been closely correlated with FCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GNR jumps, then FCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GNR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNR | 100% | -0.02% | ||
| FCX - GNR | 78% Closely correlated | +1.83% | ||
| SHEL - GNR | 73% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| RIO - GNR | 72% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| BHP - GNR | 71% Closely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| SCCO - GNR | 70% Closely correlated | +2.14% | ||
More | ||||
LITP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LITP has been closely correlated with SQM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LITP jumps, then SQM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LITP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITP | 100% | -1.17% | ||
| SQM - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| ALB - LITP | 77% Closely correlated | -3.60% | ||
| PLL - LITP | 71% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| SGML - LITP | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.51% | ||
| LAC - LITP | 53% Loosely correlated | -3.31% | ||
More | ||||