GNW
Price
$10.16
Change
+$0.17 (+1.70%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
3.84B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LNC
Price
$45.46
Change
+$0.18 (+0.40%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
8.7B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GNW vs LNC

GNW vs LNC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Genworth Financial (GNW) vs. Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Genworth Financial (GNW) and Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) both operate in the U.S. insurance and financial services sector, yet they serve distinctly different customer segments and risk profiles.
  • GNW recently touched an all-time high near $10.20 and carries a consensus "Moderate Buy" rating from analysts, though it faces leadership transition uncertainty as its CEO took a temporary leave of absence.
  • LNC trades at a notably low trailing P/E (price-to-earnings) ratio of approximately 4.5, offers a dividend yield above 4%, and has attracted multiple analyst upgrades in recent weeks, including Barclays raising the stock to Overweight.
  • Both stocks have delivered comparable one-year returns of roughly 23–25%, but their paths diverged significantly in year-to-date performance: GNW is up nearly 10% while LNC remains down approximately 4%.
  • A potential $5 billion reinsurance deal between LNC and Talcott Financial Group could materially reshape Lincoln's balance sheet, while GNW continues to benefit from its majority ownership in mortgage insurer Enact Holdings.
  • Investors comparing these two names are essentially weighing a lean, mortgage-insurance-driven value play (GNW) against a diversified, dividend-paying life insurer undergoing a capital-efficiency turnaround (LNC).

Introduction

Comparing GNW and LNC offers a revealing window into two contrasting approaches within the U.S. insurance industry. Genworth Financial, a Richmond-based holding company, derives the bulk of its value from its majority stake in mortgage insurer Enact Holdings, alongside a legacy long-term care insurance block. Lincoln National, headquartered in Radnor, Pennsylvania, operates a far broader platform spanning annuities, life insurance, group protection, and retirement plan services. Both stocks have drawn increased attention in recent weeks — GNW following a CEO leave-of-absence announcement and a run toward all-time highs, and LNC amid analyst upgrades and reports of a multibillion-dollar reinsurance transaction. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for investors seeking exposure to the insurance sector but unsure whether to favor a concentrated mortgage-insurance value story or a diversified, capital-restructuring turnaround.

GNW Overview and Recent Performance

GNW, or Genworth Financial, is a holding company that operates primarily through two segments: Enact, its majority-owned mortgage insurance subsidiary, and a Closed Block consisting mainly of legacy long-term care insurance policies. As a business, Genworth has been steadily simplifying its structure, with Enact — which trades separately as ACT on Nasdaq — functioning as the primary growth engine. In recent weeks, GNW shares have traded near multi-year highs, reaching an all-time peak of $10.20 in mid-July, supported by steady institutional accumulation (institutional ownership exceeds 91%) and improving sentiment around the U.S. housing finance sector.

A notable development came in early July when the company announced that CEO Thomas McInerney would take a temporary leave of absence for health reasons, with CFO Jerome Upton stepping in as interim CEO. Despite the leadership transition, the stock showed resilience, indicating that the market views Genworth's strategic direction as firmly established. On the earnings front, GNW reported Q1 2026 EPS (earnings per share) of $0.28, beating consensus estimates of $0.18, though revenue came in below expectations at approximately $1.04 billion. Analyst Dowling & Partners recently raised its full-year 2026 EPS estimate sharply to $1.10, well above the consensus of $0.44, signaling conviction in Genworth's earnings trajectory. The stock currently trades at a trailing P/E near 19 and a forward P/E around 9, with a price-to-book ratio of just 0.43.

LNC Overview and Recent Performance

LNC, or Lincoln National Corporation, is a diversified insurance and retirement services company with approximately $340 billion in end-of-period account balances across four operating segments: Annuities, Life Insurance, Group Protection, and Retirement Plan Services. Serving roughly 17 million customers, Lincoln has been focused on improving its capital position, optimizing its product mix toward less equity-sensitive offerings, and returning capital to shareholders. The company has paid dividends for 56 consecutive years and currently offers a forward dividend yield of approximately 4.35%.

In recent weeks, LNC has experienced a notable uptick in analyst attention. Barclays upgraded the stock to Overweight from Equal Weight in early July, citing progress toward the end of a multiyear capital-building phase and potential share repurchases. Jefferies maintained its Buy rating and raised its price target to $57. Separately, Bloomberg reported that Lincoln is in advanced talks with Talcott Financial Group on a reinsurance deal involving approximately $5 billion of universal life policies with secondary guarantees — a transaction that, if completed, would free up significant capital and reduce balance-sheet risk. The stock rallied on the news. Lincoln also completed a $500 million subordinated notes offering, further strengthening its capital base ahead of its Q2 2026 earnings report scheduled for July 30. The stock trades at a trailing P/E of roughly 4.5, a forward P/E near 4.1, and a price-to-book ratio of 0.86.

Trending AI Robots

As traders weigh the relative merits of GNW and LNC, AI-driven tools are increasingly being used to cut through market noise and identify actionable opportunities. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI trading bots that have demonstrated an ability to adapt to shifting market conditions. With hundreds of AI-powered trading bots available on the platform — each employing distinct trading styles, strategies, and timeframes — only the most consistently effective and market-aligned strategies earn a spot in this section. These bots can generate annualized returns ranging widely depending on strategy and risk parameters, with some top performers historically achieving triple-digit annualized figures. Each bot comes with transparent statistics including Sharpe ratios, drawdowns, profit factors, and closed-trade logs, allowing users to evaluate strategies before committing capital. Whether a trader is interested in swing trading insurance stocks, following momentum-based signals, or exploring sector rotation strategies, the Trending AI Robots section provides a starting point for data-driven decision-making.

Head-to-Head Comparison

While both GNW and LNC fall under the broad insurance umbrella, their business models diverge sharply. GNW is effectively a leveraged play on the U.S. housing market through its majority ownership of Enact, a leading private mortgage insurer. This gives Genworth a concentrated exposure to mortgage credit cycles, home prices, and employment trends. Its legacy long-term care block remains a headwind that management continues to manage carefully, but the Enact stake is the dominant value driver. In contrast, LNC is a diversified life and retirement company with exposure to equity markets (through variable annuities), credit markets (through its general account investment portfolio), group insurance underwriting, and retirement plan flows.

On valuation, the contrast is stark. LNC trades at a trailing P/E of roughly 4.5 — less than a quarter of GNW's ~19 — suggesting the market is pricing in considerably more uncertainty around Lincoln's earnings durability. However, LNC also offers a dividend yield exceeding 4%, which GNW does not. On a price-to-book basis, GNW appears cheaper at 0.43 versus LNC at 0.86. Risk factors differ as well: GNW faces housing cycle and regulatory risk tied to mortgage insurance capital requirements, while LNC contends with equity-market sensitivity, net outflows in its Retirement Plan Services segment, and the execution risk associated with large-scale reinsurance transactions. Recent momentum slightly favors GNW, which has risen roughly 10% year-to-date, while LNC is down about 4% over the same stretch.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, relative positioning, and near-term catalysts, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely lean toward Lincoln National Corporation (LNC) in the current environment — though with important caveats. The confluence of analyst upgrades, a potentially transformative reinsurance deal, an ultra-low valuation multiple, and a durable 4%-plus dividend yield creates a favorable risk-reward profile that algorithmic models tend to recognize. LNC's improving free-cash-flow trajectory and the prospect of resumed share buybacks add further support. That said, Genworth Financial (GNW) presents a cleaner, more focused story anchored by Enact's mortgage insurance earnings stream, and its recent all-time-high breakout signals strong trend momentum. The AI verdict would likely favor LNC for its combination of deep value, income generation, and catalyst-rich outlook, while acknowledging that GNW remains a compelling proposition for investors specifically bullish on U.S. housing and mortgage credit. As always in probabilistic frameworks, neither outcome is guaranteed, and both stocks warrant ongoing monitoring as market conditions evolve.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GNW vs. LNC commentary
Aug 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GNW is a StrongBuy and LNC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2026
Stock price -- (GNW: $10.16 vs. LNC: $45.46)
Brand notoriety: GNW and LNC are both notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GNW: 60% vs. LNC: 61%
Market capitalization -- GNW: $3.84B vs. LNC: $8.7B
GNW [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $3.84B. LNC’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $8.7B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $154.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $19.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GNW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GNW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GNW is a better buy in the long-term than LNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GNW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LNC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GNW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LNC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GNW is a better buy in the short-term than LNC.

Price Growth

GNW (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +4.85% price change this week, while LNC (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -1.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

GNW is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

LNC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-0.67% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LNC($8.7B) has a higher market cap than GNW($3.84B). GNW has higher P/E ratio than LNC: GNW (19.92) vs LNC (3.83). GNW YTD gains are higher at: 12.514 vs. LNC (5.701). LNC has more cash in the bank: 39.4B vs. GNW (8.51B). GNW has less debt than LNC: GNW (1.51B) vs LNC (6.87B). LNC has higher revenues than GNW: LNC (19.5B) vs GNW (7.07B).
GNWLNCGNW / LNC
Capitalization3.84B8.7B44%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD12.5145.701220%
P/E Ratio19.923.83520%
Revenue7.07B19.5B36%
Total Cash8.51B39.4B22%
Total Debt1.51B6.87B22%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GNW vs LNC: Fundamental Ratings
GNW
LNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8066
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
597
SMR RATING
1..100
9170
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4842
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3591
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LNC's Valuation (9) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GNW (54). This means that LNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than GNW’s over the last 12 months.

GNW's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is significantly better than the same rating for LNC (97). This means that GNW’s stock grew significantly faster than LNC’s over the last 12 months.

LNC's SMR Rating (70) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as GNW (91). This means that LNC’s stock grew similarly to GNW’s over the last 12 months.

LNC's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as GNW (48). This means that LNC’s stock grew similarly to GNW’s over the last 12 months.

GNW's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LNC (91). This means that GNW’s stock grew somewhat faster than LNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GNWLNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GNW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LNC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZBIO29.510.31
+1.06%
Zenas Biopharma Inc.
MHK140.100.98
+0.70%
Mohawk Industries
ARTNA35.780.08
+0.22%
Artesian Resources Corp
BHST2.07N/A
N/A
Bioharvest Sciences Inc
HBANZ19.45-0.02
-0.10%
Huntington Bancshares Inc

GNW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNW has been loosely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GNW jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNW
1D Price
Change %
GNW100%
+1.70%
CNO - GNW
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
MET - GNW
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
LNC - GNW
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
AFL - GNW
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
GL - GNW
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
More

LNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LNC has been closely correlated with MET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LNC jumps, then MET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LNC
1D Price
Change %
LNC100%
+0.40%
MET - LNC
69%
Closely correlated
+0.19%
JXN - LNC
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
PRU - LNC
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.30%
CNO - LNC
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
FG - LNC
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
More