Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GNWRX vs RWEBX
GNWRX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts GNWRX vs RWEBX
GNWRX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GNWRX vs. RWEBX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GNWRX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. GNWRX (1.56B). RWEBX pays higher dividends than GNWRX: RWEBX (0.75) vs GNWRX (0.06). GNWRX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: GNWRX (23 years) vs RWEBX (12 years). GNWRX (1.34) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). GNWRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 129.38 vs. RWEBX (32.00). GNWRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RWEBX: GNWRX (0) vs RWEBX (250). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.28 vs. GNWRX (-9.64). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 25.89 vs. GNWRX (-6.46).
| GNWRX | RWEBX | GNWRX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.06 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.06 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.057 | 7.392 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.56B | 218B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.06 | 0.75 | 9% |
| Returns for 1 year | -9.64 | 7.28 | -132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.32 | 29.91 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.46 | 25.89 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.08 | 75.49 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement