GNZUF vs GWLLY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GNZUF is a Hold and GWLLY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GNZUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGWLLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- GNZUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- GWLLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Price Growth
GNZUF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +12.97% price change this week, while GWLLY (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +15.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +3.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.41%.
Reported Earning Dates
GWLLY is expected to report earnings on Mar 28, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Motor Vehicles (+3.06% weekly)Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.
| GNZUF | GWLLY | GNZUF / GWLLY | |
| Capitalization | 14.1B | 28.8B | 49% |
| EBITDA | 6.11B | 7.79B | 78% |
| Gain YTD | -16.764 | -7.062 | 237% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.06 | 12.79 | 55% |
| Revenue | 113B | 133B | 85% |
| Total Cash | 38.8B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 21.2B | N/A | - |
GNZUF | GWLLY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 35 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 11 Undervalued | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 72 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | 11 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 71 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GNZUF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as GWLLY (33). This means that GNZUF’s stock grew similarly to GWLLY’s over the last 12 months.
GWLLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as GNZUF (100). This means that GWLLY’s stock grew similarly to GNZUF’s over the last 12 months.
GWLLY's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GNZUF (90). This means that GWLLY’s stock grew significantly faster than GNZUF’s over the last 12 months.
GWLLY's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as GNZUF (61). This means that GWLLY’s stock grew similarly to GNZUF’s over the last 12 months.
GNZUF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GWLLY (71). This means that GNZUF’s stock grew significantly faster than GWLLY’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TSPA | 36.68 | 1.18 | +3.32% |
| T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF | |||
| PSCH | 41.29 | 1.13 | +2.81% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap Health Care ETF | |||
| EEMA | 77.78 | 2.05 | +2.71% |
| iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF | |||
| FCEF | 21.73 | 0.28 | +1.31% |
| First Trust Income Opportunity ETF | |||
| OND | 35.94 | N/A | N/A |
| ProShares On-Demand ETF | |||
GNZUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GNZUF and FUJHY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GNZUF and FUJHY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GNZUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GNZUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| FUJHY - GNZUF | 11% Poorly correlated | +4.17% | ||
| GWLLY - GNZUF | 10% Poorly correlated | +6.71% | ||
| GWLLF - GNZUF | 7% Poorly correlated | +1.32% | ||
| FUJHF - GNZUF | 6% Poorly correlated | +5.94% | ||
| GELYY - GNZUF | 5% Poorly correlated | +2.84% | ||
More | ||||
GWLLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GWLLY and NIU have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GWLLY and NIU's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GWLLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GWLLY | 100% | +6.71% | ||
| NIU - GWLLY | 30% Poorly correlated | +5.37% | ||
| CENN - GWLLY | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.76% | ||
| GNZUF - GWLLY | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ISUZF - GWLLY | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GWLLF - GWLLY | 0% Poorly correlated | +1.32% | ||
More | ||||