GNZUF
Price
$0.45
Change
+$0.07 (+18.42%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
Capitalization
9.12B
GWLLY
Price
$21.97
Change
+$0.32 (+1.48%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
26.62B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GNZUF vs GWLLY

Header iconGNZUF vs GWLLY Comparison
Open Charts GNZUF vs GWLLYBanner chart's image
Guangzhou Automobile Group
Price$0.45
Change+$0.07 (+18.42%)
Volume$5.1K
Capitalization9.12B
Great Wall Motor
Price$21.97
Change+$0.32 (+1.48%)
Volume$438
Capitalization26.62B
GNZUF vs GWLLY Comparison Chart in %
GNZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GWLLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GNZUF vs. GWLLY commentary
Oct 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GNZUF is a Hold and GWLLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 05, 2025
Stock price -- (GNZUF: $0.45 vs. GWLLY: $21.97)
Brand notoriety: GNZUF and GWLLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Motor Vehicles industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GNZUF: 93% vs. GWLLY: 4%
Market capitalization -- GNZUF: $9.12B vs. GWLLY: $26.62B
GNZUF [@Motor Vehicles] is valued at $9.12B. GWLLY’s [@Motor Vehicles] market capitalization is $26.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Motor Vehicles] industry ranges from $1.43T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Motor Vehicles] industry is $39.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GNZUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGWLLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GNZUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GWLLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GWLLY is a better buy in the long-term than GNZUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GNZUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GWLLY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GNZUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GWLLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GWLLY is a better buy in the short-term than GNZUF.

Price Growth

GNZUF (@Motor Vehicles) experienced а +17.13% price change this week, while GWLLY (@Motor Vehicles) price change was +3.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Motor Vehicles industry was +1.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +46.41%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Motor Vehicles (+1.06% weekly)

Automobiles continue to be arguably the most popular form of passenger travel in the U.S., and major automobile makers have revenues and market capitalizations running into multi-billions. In recent years, the industry has been experiencing some path-breaking innovations like electric vehicles and self-driving technology. While there are long-standing companies like General Motors, Ford, and Toyota Motors operating in this space, there are also emerging/rapidly growing players like Tesla – which has had a major role in the growing popularity of the electric vehicle market. With technological advancements taking steam in the auto space, we’ve also witnessed collaborations (or talks of potential partnerships) of carmakers with tech behemoths like Google’s subsidiary, Waymo.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GWLLY($26.6B) has a higher market cap than GNZUF($9.12B). GNZUF has higher P/E ratio than GWLLY: GNZUF (33.21) vs GWLLY (11.01). GWLLY YTD gains are higher at: 27.809 vs. GNZUF (3.615). GWLLY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.1B vs. GNZUF (4.38B). GWLLY has more cash in the bank: 44.5B vs. GNZUF (42B). GNZUF has less debt than GWLLY: GNZUF (28B) vs GWLLY (57.9B). GWLLY has higher revenues than GNZUF: GWLLY (201B) vs GNZUF (104B).
GNZUFGWLLYGNZUF / GWLLY
Capitalization9.12B26.6B34%
EBITDA4.38B15.1B29%
Gain YTD3.61527.80913%
P/E Ratio33.2111.01302%
Revenue104B201B52%
Total Cash42B44.5B94%
Total Debt28B57.9B48%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GNZUF vs GWLLY: Fundamental Ratings
GNZUF
GWLLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
591
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
33
Fair valued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10074
SMR RATING
1..100
9354
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5247
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
316
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GWLLY's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as GNZUF (33). This means that GWLLY’s stock grew similarly to GNZUF’s over the last 12 months.

GWLLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as GNZUF (100). This means that GWLLY’s stock grew similarly to GNZUF’s over the last 12 months.

GWLLY's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GNZUF (93). This means that GWLLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than GNZUF’s over the last 12 months.

GWLLY's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as GNZUF (52). This means that GWLLY’s stock grew similarly to GNZUF’s over the last 12 months.

GNZUF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as GWLLY (16). This means that GNZUF’s stock grew similarly to GWLLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GNZUFGWLLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GNZUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GWLLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IYG89.130.60
+0.68%
iShares US Financial Services ETF
IVRS42.71N/A
N/A
iShares Future Metaverse Tec And Com ETF
EPMV22.18N/A
N/A
Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF
IBHG22.40-0.01
-0.04%
iShares® iBonds® 2027 Term HY & Inc ETF
MID66.74-0.10
-0.15%
American Century Mid Cap Gr Impact ETF

GNZUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GNZUF and FUJHY have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GNZUF and FUJHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNZUF
1D Price
Change %
GNZUF100%
N/A
FUJHY - GNZUF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
GWLLY - GNZUF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
GWLLF - GNZUF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FUJHF - GNZUF
6%
Poorly correlated
-3.46%
GELYY - GNZUF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GWLLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GWLLY and NIU have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GWLLY and NIU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GWLLY
1D Price
Change %
GWLLY100%
+1.48%
NIU - GWLLY
30%
Poorly correlated
-6.22%
CENN - GWLLY
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.94%
GNZUF - GWLLY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ISUZF - GWLLY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWLLF - GWLLY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More