GO
Price
$9.83
Change
-$0.08 (-0.81%)
Updated
Aug 10 closing price
Capitalization
973.89M
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WMK
Price
$72.09
Change
-$3.16 (-4.20%)
Updated
Aug 10 closing price
Capitalization
1.78B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GO vs WMK

GO vs WMK Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 30, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. (GO) vs. Weis Markets, Inc. (WMK) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • GO (Grocery Outlet Holding Corp.) has experienced sustained stock price erosion, declining roughly 32% over the trailing twelve months, while grappling with negative net income and substantial restructuring charges.
  • WMK (Weis Markets, Inc.) has delivered a positive year-to-date return of approximately 21–23%, supported by consistent profitability, a $0.34 quarterly dividend, and a trailing P/E (Price-to-Earnings) ratio near 19.
  • GO operates an extreme-value, "treasure hunt" retail model with aggressive store expansion, whereas WMK runs a traditional, full-service grocery model concentrated in the Mid-Atlantic region with over a century of operating history.
  • The two stocks diverge sharply on shareholder returns: WMK pays a regular dividend yielding roughly 1.75%, while GO offers no dividend and carries negative trailing EPS (Earnings Per Share).
  • Market sentiment and momentum metrics favor WMK, which has shown relative stability and upward trend consistency; GO remains under pressure from operational restructuring and margin compression.
  • Both companies operate in the grocery retail sector, but their risk profiles, growth trajectories, and capital return strategies place them on opposite ends of the defensive-to-speculative spectrum.

Introduction

Comparing two grocery retailers might seem straightforward, but GO (Grocery Outlet Holding Corp.) and WMK (Weis Markets, Inc.) represent fundamentally different philosophies in food retail. One is a high-growth extreme-value discounter in the midst of a multi-year operational overhaul; the other is a century-old regional chain with steady cash flows and a disciplined dividend policy. For investors and traders weighing growth potential against stability—or momentum against deep value—this head-to-head comparison spotlights the trade-offs embedded in these two names. Whether the goal is capital preservation, income generation, or a tactical swing trade, understanding how GO and WMK differ is essential to evaluating their places in a diversified portfolio.

GO Overview and Recent Performance

Grocery Outlet Holding Corp. (GO) is an extreme-value retailer of name-brand consumables and fresh products sold through a network of independently operated stores across 16 states. The company's "treasure hunt" shopping format—where customers browse deeply discounted, opportunistically sourced merchandise in a small-box environment—has supported steady top-line growth. In recent quarters, net sales have continued to expand at a mid-single-digit pace, driven by new store openings and modest comparable-store-sales gains.

However, the stock has been under considerable pressure. Over the past twelve months, GO shares have declined approximately 32%, with the price hovering near $9 as of late July 2026. The company has booked significant restructuring charges—totaling tens of millions of dollars—related to systems integration and operational realignment following past acquisitions. GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) net income turned deeply negative on a trailing-twelve-month basis, partly due to these non-recurring items. Even on an adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) basis, margins have narrowed. While the company continues to open new stores and refine its value proposition, the market has been unforgiving, and the stock remains well below its 52-week high. Analysts have generally maintained a "Hold" rating, reflecting a cautious outlook.

WMK Overview and Recent Performance

Weis Markets, Inc. (WMK) is a Mid-Atlantic grocery chain founded in 1912, operating approximately 201 stores across seven states including Pennsylvania, Maryland, and New Jersey. Unlike the discount-driven GO model, Weis Markets runs a conventional full-service supermarket format with in-store pharmacies, fuel stations, and an extensive private-label offering. The business emphasizes operational consistency and customer loyalty within its regional footprint.

WMK stock has performed notably well in the current market cycle. Year-to-date, shares have gained roughly 21–23%, and the stock recently changed hands near $78, not far from its 52-week high. The company has posted consistent quarterly profits, with recent quarterly EPS figures around $1.00–$1.13 per share. Comparable-store sales excluding fuel have grown at a steady low-to-mid single-digit pace. Weis Markets also maintains a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.34 per share, and the company carries a healthy balance sheet with negligible long-term debt. With a beta of approximately 0.45, WMK has exhibited considerably lower volatility than the broader market, reinforcing its appeal as a defensive consumer-staples holding.

Trending AI Robots

In an era where algorithmic trading is reshaping how market participants approach stock selection, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated gateway into this evolving landscape. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively trade across thousands of different tickers, but only the strongest performers—those best aligned with current market conditions—earn a spot in this featured section. These bots span an array of trading styles, from short-term momentum strategies on 5-minute and 15-minute timeframes to multi-day swing approaches, and their annualized returns have ranged from approximately 75% to over 500% in select forward-tested scenarios. Each bot comes with its own set of statistics, including win rates, closed-trade profit/loss figures, maximum drawdowns, and trade frequency. No single bot suits every market environment, which is why the Trending AI Robots section is continuously refreshed to reflect real-time performance and adaptability. For traders seeking to complement their own research with AI-generated signals, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can serve as a practical starting point.

Head-to-Head Comparison

On the surface, GO and WMK both operate in grocery retail, but the similarities largely end there. Business model: GO is an asset-light, extreme-value discounter reliant on opportunistic buying and independent operators; WMK is a vertically integrated traditional grocer with company-owned stores, distribution centers, and manufacturing capabilities. Growth strategy: GO is in expansion mode, targeting new store openings and geographic penetration; WMK grows organically through same-store sales improvements and occasional new locations within its existing footprint. Profitability: WMK consistently generates positive net income and robust operating cash flow; GO's bottom line has been weighed down by restructuring costs and integration expenses, pushing TTM earnings deep into negative territory. Shareholder returns: WMK pays a dependable quarterly dividend; GO does not. Risk profile: GO's higher operational complexity and ongoing restructuring introduce greater uncertainty, while WMK's regional concentration in the Mid-Atlantic represents a geographic-concentration risk of its own. Market sentiment: WMK's upward price trend and low beta signal institutional confidence; GO's prolonged downtrend and compressed valuation suggest deep skepticism, though value-oriented investors may view the depressed price as a potential contrarian opportunity.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, relative stability, and fundamental momentum, a Tickeron AI-driven analysis would likely favor WMK over GO in the current market environment. WMK's steady uptrend, consistent profitability, low volatility, and reliable dividend stream align well with pattern-recognition models that prioritize drawdown minimization and signal reliability. GO, by contrast, continues to trade within a well-defined downtrend, and its negative earnings profile—coupled with ongoing restructuring uncertainty—reduces the probability of generating high-confidence bullish signals in the near term. While a mean-reversion or turnaround scenario for GO cannot be ruled out, AI models trained on momentum and stability metrics would tend to assign a higher probability of favorable risk-adjusted outcomes to WMK under present conditions. This assessment is probabilistic in nature and reflects relative positioning rather than an absolute forecast.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GO vs. WMK commentary
Aug 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GO is a Hold and WMK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2026
Stock price -- (GO: $9.83 vs. WMK: $72.09)
Brand notoriety: GO and WMK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GO: 115% vs. WMK: 92%
Market capitalization -- GO: $973.89M vs. WMK: $1.78B
GO [@Food Retail] is valued at $973.89M. WMK’s [@Food Retail] market capitalization is $1.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food Retail] industry ranges from $51.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food Retail] industry is $4.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWMK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WMK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, WMK is a better buy in the long-term than GO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GO’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WMK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GO’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WMK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GO is a better buy in the short-term than WMK.

Price Growth

GO (@Food Retail) experienced а +0.82% price change this week, while WMK (@Food Retail) price change was -7.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food Retail industry was -1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

GO is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food Retail (-1.60% weekly)

The food retail industry includes companies that sell food, beverage and household products. Items sold include grocery, gourmet food, fresh produce, and frozen food. Kroger Co., George Weston Ltd., Grocery Outlet Holding Corp., and Sprouts Farmers Markets, Inc. are examples of major food retailers. While e-commerce companies like Amazon have increasingly been ramping-up offerings in the food retail space, several traditional players have also been expanding their online presence to stand their ground against rising competition.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WMK($1.78B) has a higher market cap than GO($974M). GO has higher P/E ratio than WMK: GO (177.13) vs WMK (17.98). WMK YTD gains are higher at: 14.072 vs. GO (-2.673). WMK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 254M vs. GO (-241.69M). WMK has less debt than GO: WMK (174M) vs GO (1.84B). WMK has higher revenues than GO: WMK (5.01B) vs GO (4.73B).
GOWMKGO / WMK
Capitalization974M1.78B55%
EBITDA-241.69M254M-95%
Gain YTD-2.67314.072-19%
P/E Ratio177.1317.98985%
Revenue4.73B5.01B94%
Total Cash59MN/A-
Total Debt1.84B174M1,059%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GO vs WMK: Fundamental Ratings
GO
WMK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5054
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10058
SMR RATING
1..100
9881
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5954
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
346
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WMK's Valuation (65) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as GO (72) in the null industry. This means that WMK’s stock grew similarly to GO’s over the last 12 months.

WMK's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Food Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GO (100) in the null industry. This means that WMK’s stock grew somewhat faster than GO’s over the last 12 months.

WMK's SMR Rating (81) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as GO (98) in the null industry. This means that WMK’s stock grew similarly to GO’s over the last 12 months.

WMK's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Food Retail industry is in the same range as GO (59) in the null industry. This means that WMK’s stock grew similarly to GO’s over the last 12 months.

GO's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WMK (46) in the Food Retail industry. This means that GO’s stock grew somewhat faster than WMK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GOWMK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
48%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WMK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PEVC32.130.18
+0.57%
Pacer PE/VC ETF
EUIG49.95N/A
N/A
iShares Euro IG Corp Bd USD H ETF
JGRW28.83-0.05
-0.16%
Jensen Quality Growth ETF
XSHQ48.85-0.54
-1.09%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Quality ETF
FREL29.48-0.43
-1.44%
Fidelity MSCI Real Estate ETF

GO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GO has been loosely correlated with WMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GO jumps, then WMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GO
1D Price
Change %
GO100%
-0.81%
WMK - GO
43%
Loosely correlated
-4.20%
IMKTA - GO
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.95%
NGVC - GO
29%
Poorly correlated
-7.50%
SFM - GO
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
VLGEA - GO
18%
Poorly correlated
-3.61%
More

WMK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WMK has been closely correlated with IMKTA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WMK jumps, then IMKTA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WMK
1D Price
Change %
WMK100%
-4.20%
IMKTA - WMK
70%
Closely correlated
-2.95%
NGVC - WMK
48%
Loosely correlated
-7.50%
GO - WMK
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
ACI - WMK
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
KR - WMK
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
More