GOFPY
Price
$8.99
Change
+$0.04 (+0.45%)
Updated
Mar 7 closing price
Capitalization
6.5B
MCHVF
Price
$1.19
Change
+$0.11 (+10.19%)
Updated
Feb 24 closing price
Capitalization
5.04B
Ad is loading...

GOFPY vs MCHVF

Header iconGOFPY vs MCHVF Comparison
Open Charts GOFPY vs MCHVFBanner chart's image
Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA
Price$8.99
Change+$0.04 (+0.45%)
Volume$12.94K
Capitalization6.5B
MGM China Holdings
Price$1.19
Change+$0.11 (+10.19%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.04B
GOFPY vs MCHVF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GOFPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GOFPY vs. MCHVF commentary
Mar 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GOFPY is a Hold and MCHVF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 11, 2025
Stock price -- (GOFPY: $8.99 vs. MCHVF: $1.19)
Brand notoriety: GOFPY and MCHVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GOFPY: 79% vs. MCHVF: 13%
Market capitalization -- GOFPY: $6.5B vs. MCHVF: $5.04B
GOFPY [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $6.5B. MCHVF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $5.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GOFPY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GOFPY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MCHVF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GOFPY is a better buy in the long-term than MCHVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GOFPY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GOFPY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

GOFPY (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +1.30% price change this week, while MCHVF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -2.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +72.61%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (-2.61% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GOFPY($6.5B) has a higher market cap than MCHVF($5.04B). MCHVF YTD gains are higher at: 13.333 vs. GOFPY (9.835). GOFPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 686M vs. MCHVF (-1.06B). MCHVF has higher revenues than GOFPY: MCHVF (7.92B) vs GOFPY (1.3B).
GOFPYMCHVFGOFPY / MCHVF
Capitalization6.5B5.04B129%
EBITDA686M-1.06B-65%
Gain YTD9.83513.33374%
P/E Ratio15.13N/A-
Revenue1.3B7.92B16%
Total CashN/A6.95B-
Total DebtN/A30.6B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GOFPY vs MCHVF: Fundamental Ratings
GOFPY
MCHVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10100
SMR RATING
1..100
15100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1997
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCHVF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GOFPY (85). This means that MCHVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GOFPY’s over the last 12 months.

GOFPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCHVF (100). This means that GOFPY’s stock grew significantly faster than MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

GOFPY's SMR Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCHVF (100). This means that GOFPY’s stock grew significantly faster than MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

MCHVF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as GOFPY (46). This means that MCHVF’s stock grew similarly to GOFPY’s over the last 12 months.

GOFPY's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCHVF (97). This means that GOFPY’s stock grew significantly faster than MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GOFPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GOFPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VCRIX13.510.17
+1.27%
NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure Class I
SEKRX19.240.18
+0.94%
DWS Emerging Markets Equity R6
MGRBX41.670.29
+0.70%
MFS International Growth B
JHSOX25.100.04
+0.16%
JHancock New Opportunities I
NBGTX27.77-0.03
-0.11%
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth Tr

GOFPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GOFPY and GMVHF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GOFPY and GMVHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GOFPY
1D Price
Change %
GOFPY100%
+0.45%
GMVHF - GOFPY
9%
Poorly correlated
-5.04%
GRKZF - GOFPY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYEF - GOFPY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVF - GOFPY
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVY - GOFPY
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MCHVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHVF has been loosely correlated with SKYZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHVF jumps, then SKYZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHVF
1D Price
Change %
MCHVF100%
N/A
SKYZF - MCHVF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SCHYF - MCHVF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVY - MCHVF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYYY - MCHVF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
GXYEF - MCHVF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More