GOFPY
Price
$11.38
Change
-$0.04 (-0.35%)
Updated
Jul 9 closing price
Capitalization
6.5B
MCHVF
Price
$1.92
Change
+$0.41 (+27.15%)
Updated
Jul 8 closing price
Capitalization
5.04B
Interact to see
Advertisement

GOFPY vs MCHVF

Header iconGOFPY vs MCHVF Comparison
Open Charts GOFPY vs MCHVFBanner chart's image
Greek Organisation of Football Prognostics SA
Price$11.38
Change-$0.04 (-0.35%)
Volume$6.27K
Capitalization6.5B
MGM China Holdings
Price$1.92
Change+$0.41 (+27.15%)
Volume$300
Capitalization5.04B
GOFPY vs MCHVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GOFPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GOFPY vs. MCHVF commentary
Jul 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GOFPY is a StrongBuy and MCHVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 11, 2025
Stock price -- (GOFPY: $11.38 vs. MCHVF: $1.92)
Brand notoriety: GOFPY and MCHVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GOFPY: 52% vs. MCHVF: 38%
Market capitalization -- GOFPY: $6.5B vs. MCHVF: $5.04B
GOFPY [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $6.5B. MCHVF’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $5.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $38.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $6.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GOFPY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMCHVF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GOFPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MCHVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GOFPY is a better buy in the long-term than MCHVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GOFPY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCHVF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GOFPY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MCHVF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GOFPY is a better buy in the short-term than MCHVF.

Price Growth

GOFPY (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -2.78% price change this week, while MCHVF (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was +27.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +4.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.11%.

Reported Earning Dates

GOFPY is expected to report earnings on May 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+4.97% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GOFPY($6.5B) has a higher market cap than MCHVF($5.04B). MCHVF YTD gains are higher at: 82.857 vs. GOFPY (44.703). GOFPY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 686M vs. MCHVF (-1.06B). MCHVF has higher revenues than GOFPY: MCHVF (7.92B) vs GOFPY (1.3B).
GOFPYMCHVFGOFPY / MCHVF
Capitalization6.5B5.04B129%
EBITDA686M-1.06B-65%
Gain YTD44.70382.85754%
P/E Ratio15.13N/A-
Revenue1.3B7.92B16%
Total CashN/A6.95B-
Total DebtN/A30.6B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GOFPY vs MCHVF: Fundamental Ratings
GOFPY
MCHVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1594
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
266
SMR RATING
1..100
17100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4138
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5186
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MCHVF's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as GOFPY (90). This means that MCHVF’s stock grew similarly to GOFPY’s over the last 12 months.

GOFPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHVF (66). This means that GOFPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

GOFPY's SMR Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MCHVF (100). This means that GOFPY’s stock grew significantly faster than MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

MCHVF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as GOFPY (41). This means that MCHVF’s stock grew similarly to GOFPY’s over the last 12 months.

GOFPY's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCHVF (86). This means that GOFPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCHVF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GOFPYMCHVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
72%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GOFPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCHVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RNPEX68.960.12
+0.17%
American Funds New Perspective R4
GCTAX48.46N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq A
MNVAX29.69N/A
N/A
Madison Large Cap A
CIAGX11.77N/A
N/A
AB Concentrated International Growth A
DLDRX44.64N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Natural Resources I

GOFPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GOFPY and GMVHF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GOFPY and GMVHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GOFPY
1D Price
Change %
GOFPY100%
-0.35%
GMVHF - GOFPY
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
GRKZF - GOFPY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYEF - GOFPY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVF - GOFPY
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVY - GOFPY
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MCHVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCHVF has been loosely correlated with SKYZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MCHVF jumps, then SKYZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCHVF
1D Price
Change %
MCHVF100%
N/A
SKYZF - MCHVF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SCHYF - MCHVF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCHVY - MCHVF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GXYYY - MCHVF
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.47%
GXYEF - MCHVF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More