Ad is loading...
GOLF
Price
$69.31
Change
+$1.05 (+1.54%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
100 days until earnings call
SNMSF
Price
$22.19
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
107 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

GOLF vs SNMSF

Header iconGOLF vs SNMSF Comparison
Open Charts GOLF vs SNMSFBanner chart's image
Acushnet Holdings
Price$69.31
Change+$1.05 (+1.54%)
Volume$223.9K
CapitalizationN/A
SPIN MASTER
Price$22.19
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2.57K
CapitalizationN/A
GOLF vs SNMSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
GOLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GOLF vs. SNMSF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GOLF is a Sell and SNMSF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (GOLF: $69.31 vs. SNMSF: $22.19)
Brand notoriety: GOLF and SNMSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GOLF: 71% vs. SNMSF: 52%
Market capitalization -- GOLF: $4.19B vs. SNMSF: $2.67B
GOLF [@Recreational Products] is valued at $4.19B. SNMSF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $2.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GOLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSNMSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GOLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SNMSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GOLF is a better buy in the long-term than SNMSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GOLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GOLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

GOLF (@Recreational Products) experienced а -4.44% price change this week, while SNMSF (@Recreational Products) price change was -0.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -5.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

GOLF is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

SNMSF is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-5.12% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GOLF($4.19B) has a higher market cap than SNMSF($2.67B). GOLF has higher P/E ratio than SNMSF: GOLF (22.79) vs SNMSF (16.20). GOLF YTD gains are higher at: 10.805 vs. SNMSF (-16.359). GOLF (337M) and SNMSF (324M) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . SNMSF has more cash in the bank: 651M vs. GOLF (65.4M). SNMSF has less debt than GOLF: SNMSF (63.3M) vs GOLF (701M). GOLF has higher revenues than SNMSF: GOLF (2.38B) vs SNMSF (1.87B).
GOLFSNMSFGOLF / SNMSF
Capitalization4.19B2.67B157%
EBITDA337M324M104%
Gain YTD10.805-16.359-66%
P/E Ratio22.7916.20141%
Revenue2.38B1.87B128%
Total Cash65.4M651M10%
Total Debt701M63.3M1,107%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GOLF vs SNMSF: Fundamental Ratings
GOLF
SNMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
40
Fair valued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10100
SMR RATING
1..100
4784
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4660
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
303
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GOLF's Valuation (40) in the null industry is in the same range as SNMSF (67). This means that GOLF’s stock grew similarly to SNMSF’s over the last 12 months.

GOLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SNMSF (100). This means that GOLF’s stock grew significantly faster than SNMSF’s over the last 12 months.

GOLF's SMR Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNMSF (84). This means that GOLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNMSF’s over the last 12 months.

GOLF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as SNMSF (60). This means that GOLF’s stock grew similarly to SNMSF’s over the last 12 months.

SNMSF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as GOLF (30). This means that SNMSF’s stock grew similarly to GOLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GOLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GOLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GBPCAD1.790.01
+0.34%
United Kingdom Pound - Canadian Dollar
TIPX18.590.01
+0.05%
SPDR® Blmbg 1-10 Year TIPS ETF
GJUL36.41-0.24
-0.67%
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Jul
CHFRUB110.70-1.11
-1.00%
Switzerland Franc - Russia Ruble
AVEWX20.38-0.24
-1.16%
Ave Maria World Equity

SNMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNMSF and WGO have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNMSF and WGO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNMSF
1D Price
Change %
SNMSF100%
N/A
WGO - SNMSF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
OSW - SNMSF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
DOOO - SNMSF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.80%
MODG - SNMSF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
GOLF - SNMSF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
More