Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GPAFX vs RMEBX
GPAFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GPAFX vs RMEBX
Victory RS Large Cap Alpha A
Price$58.61
Change+$0.37 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets507.25M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$58.30
Change+$0.33 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.64B
GPAFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPAFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPAFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 106B vs. GPAFX (507M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GPAFX: RMEBX (1.16) vs GPAFX (0.91). GPAFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GPAFX (53 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GPAFX (0.91). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GPAFX (27.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPAFX: RMEBX (250) vs GPAFX (2500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.32 vs. GPAFX (-3.22). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 59.96 vs. GPAFX (39.27).
| GPAFX | RMEBX | GPAFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.07 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.07 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.662 | 6.766 | 39% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 507M | 106B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.16 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.22 | 9.32 | -35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.66 | 27.70 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.27 | 59.96 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 3.15 | 70.29 | 4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers