Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GPAFX vs RMEBX
GPAFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GPAFX vs RMEBX
Victory RS Large Cap Alpha A
Price$60.67
Change+$0.34 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets527.24M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$59.79
Change+$0.38 (+0.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets108.37B
GPAFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPAFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPAFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 108B vs. GPAFX (527M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GPAFX: RMEBX (1.12) vs GPAFX (0.88). GPAFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GPAFX (53 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GPAFX (0.91). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GPAFX (27.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPAFX: RMEBX (250) vs GPAFX (2500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.31 vs. GPAFX (-0.55). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 60.65 vs. GPAFX (44.44).
| GPAFX | RMEBX | GPAFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.07 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.07 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.346 | 9.495 | 67% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 527M | 108B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.88 | 1.12 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.55 | 11.31 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.47 | 28.70 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.44 | 60.65 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.37 | 77.57 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement