Ad is loading...
GPAFX vs RMEBX
GPAFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GPAFX vs RMEBX
Victory RS Large Cap Alpha A
Price$56.98
Change+$0.28 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets496.36M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$55.41
Change+$0.11 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets100.91B
GPAFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPAFX vs. RMEBX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPAFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 101B vs. GPAFX (496M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GPAFX: RMEBX (1.21) vs GPAFX (0.93). GPAFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GPAFX (53 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GPAFX (0.93). RMEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. GPAFX (27.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPAFX: RMEBX (250) vs GPAFX (2500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.19 vs. GPAFX (-5.99). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 55.02 vs. GPAFX (39.68).
| GPAFX | RMEBX | GPAFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.07 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.93 | 1.07 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 53 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.053 | 1.203 | -4% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 496M | 101B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 1.21 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.99 | 5.19 | -115% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.68 | 16.77 | 64% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.68 | 55.02 | 72% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.02 | 58.89 | 2% |