Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GPAFX vs RMEBX
GPAFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GPAFX vs RMEBX
GPAFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPAFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Sep 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPAFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GPAFX (590M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GPAFX: RMEBX (0.99) vs GPAFX (0.74). GPAFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GPAFX (54 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GPAFX (0.90). GPAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPAFX: RMEBX (250) vs GPAFX (2500). GPAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.19 vs. RMEBX (7.37). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.55 vs. GPAFX (17.88).
| GPAFX | RMEBX | GPAFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.07 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.07 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 54 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.788 | 9.484 | 145% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 590M | 118B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 0.99 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.19 | 7.37 | 152% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.22 | 36.25 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.88 | 33.55 | 53% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.37 | 88.62 | 43% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement