Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GPAFX vs RMEBX
GPAFX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GPAFX vs RMEBX
GPAFX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPAFX vs. RMEBX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPAFX is a Buy and RMEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GPAFX (561M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than GPAFX: RMEBX (1.00) vs GPAFX (0.79). GPAFX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GPAFX (54 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GPAFX (0.90). GPAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPAFX: RMEBX (250) vs GPAFX (2500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.56 vs. GPAFX (6.31). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.13 vs. GPAFX (13.17).
| GPAFX | RMEBX | GPAFX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.07 | 83% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.07 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 54 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.630 | 9.246 | 83% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 561M | 118B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.00 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.31 | 7.56 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.25 | 31.88 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.17 | 36.13 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.29 | 89.32 | 35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement