Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GPAFX vs RMFEX
GPAFX vs RMFEX Comparison
Open Charts GPAFX vs RMFEX
GPAFX vs RMFEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPAFX vs. RMFEX commentary
Jun 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPAFX is a Buy and RMFEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFEX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GPAFX (546M). RMFEX pays higher dividends than GPAFX: RMFEX (1.45) vs GPAFX (0.80). GPAFX was incepted earlier than RMFEX: GPAFX (54 years) vs RMFEX (24 years). GPAFX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RMFEX (0.62). GPAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. RMFEX (30.00). RMFEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPAFX: RMFEX (250) vs GPAFX (2500). RMFEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.69 vs. GPAFX (6.90). RMFEX return over 5 years is better than : 35.70 vs. GPAFX (7.41).
| GPAFX | RMFEX | GPAFX / RMFEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.62 | 144% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.62 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 54 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.162 | 6.156 | 68% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 546M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 1.45 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.90 | 9.69 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.17 | 35.70 | 82% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.41 | 35.70 | 21% |
| Returns for 10 years | 29.99 | 99.32 | 30% |