Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GPGIX vs SCWFX
GPGIX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GPGIX vs SCWFX
GPGIX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPGIX vs. SCWFX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPGIX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. GPGIX (348M). GPGIX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: GPGIX (0.94) vs SCWFX (0.58). GPGIX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GPGIX (15 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). GPGIX (1.36) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). GPGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPGIX: SCWFX (250) vs GPGIX (1000). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.66 vs. GPGIX (7.97). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : -7.17 vs. GPGIX (-32.66).
| GPGIX | SCWFX | GPGIX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.07 | 125% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.07 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.795 | 10.314 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 348M | 94.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.94 | 0.58 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.97 | 12.66 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.64 | 27.26 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.66 | -7.17 | 456% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.46 | 79.75 | 36% |