Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GPGIX vs SMCWX
GPGIX vs SMCWX Comparison
Open Charts GPGIX vs SMCWX
GPGIX vs SMCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPGIX vs. SMCWX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPGIX is a Hold and SMCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMCWX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. GPGIX (344M). GPGIX pays higher dividends than SMCWX: GPGIX (0.92) vs SMCWX (0.60). GPGIX was incepted earlier than SMCWX: GPGIX (15 years) vs SMCWX (36 years). GPGIX (1.36) is less costly to investors than SMCWX (1.03). GPGIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. SMCWX (41.00). SMCWX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPGIX: SMCWX (250) vs GPGIX (1000). SMCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.99 vs. GPGIX (3.44). SMCWX return over 5 years is better than : -9.27 vs. GPGIX (-35.42).
| GPGIX | SMCWX | GPGIX / SMCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.34 | 1.03 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.36 | 1.03 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 36 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.511 | 12.294 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 344M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.92 | 0.60 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.44 | 8.99 | 38% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.46 | 37.46 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.42 | -9.27 | 382% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.32 | 83.28 | 33% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement