Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GPGOX vs SCWFX
GPGOX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GPGOX vs SCWFX
GPGOX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPGOX vs. SCWFX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPGOX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. GPGOX (344M). GPGOX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: GPGOX (0.72) vs SCWFX (0.54). GPGOX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GPGOX (15 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). GPGOX (1.61) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). GPGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPGOX: SCWFX (250) vs GPGOX (1000). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.95 vs. GPGOX (3.86). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : -6.86 vs. GPGOX (-34.19).
| GPGOX | SCWFX | GPGOX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.07 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 1.07 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.038 | 10.508 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 344M | 94.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.54 | 132% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.86 | 10.95 | 35% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.58 | 27.91 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.19 | -6.86 | 499% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.56 | 81.23 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement