Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GPGOX vs SCWFX
GPGOX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GPGOX vs SCWFX
GPGOX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPGOX vs. SCWFX commentary
Jun 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPGOX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. GPGOX (347M). GPGOX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: GPGOX (0.72) vs SCWFX (0.59). GPGOX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GPGOX (15 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). GPGOX (1.61) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). GPGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPGOX: SCWFX (250) vs GPGOX (1000). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.48 vs. GPGOX (6.51). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.68 vs. GPGOX (-32.75).
| GPGOX | SCWFX | GPGOX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.07 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 1.07 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.746 | 8.523 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 347M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.59 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.51 | 13.48 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.04 | 32.20 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.75 | -8.68 | 377% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.08 | 82.88 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement