Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GPGOX vs SCWFX
GPGOX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts GPGOX vs SCWFX
GPGOX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPGOX vs. SCWFX commentary
Sep 09, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPGOX is a Hold and SCWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. GPGOX (351M). GPGOX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: GPGOX (0.71) vs SCWFX (0.56). GPGOX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: GPGOX (15 years) vs SCWFX (26 years). GPGOX (1.61) is less costly to investors than SCWFX (1.07). GPGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPGOX: SCWFX (250) vs GPGOX (1000). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.34 vs. GPGOX (4.88). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.51 vs. GPGOX (-35.20).
| GPGOX | SCWFX | GPGOX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.07 | 149% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 1.07 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.536 | 14.076 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 351M | 89B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 0.56 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.88 | 11.34 | 43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.99 | 39.03 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -35.20 | -8.51 | 414% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.32 | 83.84 | 29% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement