Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GPGOX vs SFCWX
GPGOX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GPGOX vs SFCWX
GPGOX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPGOX vs. SFCWX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPGOX is a Hold and SFCWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 89B vs. GPGOX (361M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GPGOX: SFCWX (0.92) vs GPGOX (0.72). GPGOX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GPGOX (15 years) vs SFCWX (10 years). GPGOX (1.61) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GPGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. SFCWX (41.00). GPGOX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GPGOX (1000) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.37 vs. GPGOX (9.11). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : -0.17 vs. GPGOX (-32.53).
| GPGOX | SFCWX | GPGOX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.65 | 245% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 0.65 | 248% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.869 | 17.536 | 85% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 361M | 89B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.92 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.11 | 17.37 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.97 | 43.03 | 42% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.53 | -0.17 | 19,238% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.90 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers