Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GPGOX vs SFCWX
GPGOX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GPGOX vs SFCWX
GPGOX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPGOX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jun 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPGOX is a Hold and SFCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. GPGOX (347M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GPGOX: SFCWX (0.92) vs GPGOX (0.72). GPGOX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GPGOX (15 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). GPGOX (1.61) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GPGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. SFCWX (41.00). GPGOX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GPGOX (1000) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.14 vs. GPGOX (6.51). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : -6.61 vs. GPGOX (-32.75).
| GPGOX | SFCWX | GPGOX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.65 | 245% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 0.65 | 248% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.746 | 8.735 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 347M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.92 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.51 | 14.14 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.04 | 34.11 | 32% |
| Returns for 5 years | -32.75 | -6.61 | 496% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.08 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement