Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GPGOX vs SFCWX
GPGOX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts GPGOX vs SFCWX
GPGOX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
GPGOX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jul 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPGOX is a Hold and SFCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 94.3B vs. GPGOX (344M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than GPGOX: SFCWX (0.86) vs GPGOX (0.72). GPGOX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: GPGOX (15 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). GPGOX (1.61) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). GPGOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. SFCWX (41.00). GPGOX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFCWX: GPGOX (1000) vs SFCWX (1000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.59 vs. GPGOX (3.86). SFCWX return over 5 years is better than : -4.74 vs. GPGOX (-34.19).
| GPGOX | SFCWX | GPGOX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.65 | 245% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 0.65 | 248% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.038 | 10.775 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 344M | 94.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 0.86 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.86 | 11.59 | 33% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.58 | 29.77 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | -34.19 | -4.74 | 722% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement