Advertisement
GPIQ vs LRCX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPIQ is a Hold and LRCX is a Hold.
LRCX | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 80 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| GPIQ | LRCX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 88% | 12 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 82% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FLMI | 23.41 | 0.12 | +0.52% |
| Franklin Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (FLMI) | |||
| SMOG | 135.71 | 0.67 | +0.49% |
| VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF (SMOG) | |||
| DDEC | 49.01 | 0.01 | +0.01% |
| FT Vest US Equity Deep Buffer ETF - December (DDEC) | |||
| NVDG | 18.84 | N/A | N/A |
| Leverage Shares 2X Long Nvda Daily ETF | |||
| DGJA | 32.33 | N/A | N/A |
| FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Digital Return ETF - January (DGJA) | |||
GPIQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPIQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GPIQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GPIQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GPIQ | 100% | -0.21% | ||
| LRCX - GPIQ | 76% Closely correlated | -2.73% | ||
| KLAC - GPIQ | 72% Closely correlated | -3.22% | ||
| AMAT - GPIQ | 72% Closely correlated | -6.69% | ||
| AMD - GPIQ | 72% Closely correlated | +1.90% | ||
| ASML - GPIQ | 70% Closely correlated | -1.86% | ||
More | ||||
LRCX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LRCX has been closely correlated with AMAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LRCX jumps, then AMAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LRCX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LRCX | 100% | -2.73% | ||
| AMAT - LRCX | 90% Closely correlated | -6.69% | ||
| KLAC - LRCX | 88% Closely correlated | -3.22% | ||
| ASML - LRCX | 85% Closely correlated | -1.86% | ||
| NVMI - LRCX | 85% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| RMBS - LRCX | 80% Closely correlated | -2.84% | ||
More | ||||