GPOR
Price
$160.23
Change
-$3.80 (-2.32%)
Updated
Jun 17, 03:13 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.95B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RRC
Price
$36.96
Change
-$0.55 (-1.47%)
Updated
Jun 17, 01:36 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.84B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GPOR vs RRC

Header iconGPOR vs RRC Comparison
Open Charts GPOR vs RRCBanner chart's image
GPOR vs RRC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) vs. Range Resources Corporation (RRC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both GPOR and RRC are independent natural gas-focused exploration and production (E&P) companies operating in key U.S. basins, facing headwinds from sub-$2.70 natural gas prices.
  • RRC outperforms year-to-date with +17% returns compared to GPOR's +7%, reflecting stronger momentum in recent market activity.
  • GPOR trades at a lower trailing P/E ratio of 9x versus RRC's 15x, suggesting relative value in the smaller-cap peer.
  • RRC boasts a larger market cap ($9.7B vs. $3.6B) and higher liquidity, with average daily volume exceeding 3.5 million shares.
  • Recent analyst actions include raised price targets for GPOR amid strong adjusted EBITDA guidance, while RRC faces modest target trims ahead of Q1 earnings.
  • Both stocks exhibit low betas (under 0.6), indicating reduced volatility relative to the broader market.

Introduction

In the current market environment marked by subdued natural gas prices hovering below $2.70 per MMBtu, investors and traders are scrutinizing pure-play U.S. natural gas producers like Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) and Range Resources Corporation (RRC). Both companies focus on high-quality acreage in prolific basins such as Utica, Marcellus, and SCOOP, making them direct comparables for those seeking exposure to natural gas E&P amid shifting supply-demand dynamics and potential LNG export growth. This comparison highlights relative performance, valuation, and sentiment to aid decisions in volatile energy markets.

GPOR Overview and Recent Performance

Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is an independent E&P company primarily engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and production of natural gas, crude oil, and natural gas liquids (NGLs) in the United States. Its core assets span the Utica Shale in eastern Ohio and Marcellus Shale, alongside the SCOOP (South Central Oklahoma Oil Province) Woodford and Springer formations in Oklahoma. In recent market activity, GPOR shares have traded around $193, within a 52-week range of $161-$226, supported by a year-to-date gain of about 7%. Sentiment has benefited from robust 2025 adjusted EBITDA of $878.5 million on 29% liquids growth, alongside analyst price target increases to $230 despite a leadership transition. Low natural gas prices have pressured margins, yet strong free cash flow generation ($140 million TTM) and a debt-to-equity ratio of 43% underscore operational resilience.

RRC Overview and Recent Performance

Range Resources Corporation (RRC) operates as an independent natural gas, NGLs, and oil producer, with premier acreage concentrated in the Appalachian Basin, including Marcellus and Utica shales. It markets production to utilities, midstream firms, and industrial end-users. Recently, RRC shares have hovered near $41, in a 52-week band of $33-$48, delivering superior year-to-date returns of 17% and 22% over one year. Performance reflects hedging effectiveness amid weak nat gas pricing, with upcoming Q1 earnings anticipated to clarify guidance. Analyst adjustments have included slight price target reductions to around $45, tempered by broader sector supply overhangs, though free cash flow remains robust at $343 million TTM and debt-to-equity at 32% signals balance sheet strength.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI-powered trading bots out of over 350 available, curated for current market conditions across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse AI/ML strategies—from multi-agent systems to volatility plays—with timeframes spanning 5 minutes to 60 days, targeting sectors like semiconductors, gold miners, and leveraged ETFs. Standout performers boast annualized returns up to +168%, win rates of 54%-88%, and profit factors exceeding 11x, such as a 60-minute multi-agent bot on USAR/SMR/CIFR with +168% returns and 75% win rate. While not exclusively focused on energy tickers, their adaptive algorithms highlight momentum in volatile assets. Traders can explore these high-performing bots for automated strategies tailored to today’s markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

GPOR and RRC share similar business models as natural gas-heavy E&P firms, but RRC’s larger Appalachian footprint offers scale advantages over GPOR’s diversified Utica/SCOOP mix. Growth drivers include liquids exposure for GPOR (29% recent growth) versus RRC’s hedging discipline. Recent momentum favors RRC with superior returns, though GPOR’s lower valuation presents a value trade-off. Risk factors are aligned—nat gas price volatility and supply glut—but RRC’s bigger market cap and liquidity mitigate execution risks. Sector exposure is nearly identical, yet sentiment tilts toward RRC for stability amid low prices.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward RRC due to its consistent trend strength, superior relative performance year-to-date, larger scale for liquidity, and upcoming earnings catalyst positioning it favorably in a low nat gas environment. While GPOR offers attractive valuation, RRC exhibits greater stability and momentum probability in recent data patterns.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
GPOR vs. RRC commentary
Jun 17, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GPOR is a Hold and RRC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 17, 2026
Stock price -- (GPOR: $164.03 vs. RRC: $37.51)
Brand notoriety: GPOR: Not notable vs. RRC: Notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GPOR: 112% vs. RRC: 118%
Market capitalization -- GPOR: $2.95B vs. RRC: $8.84B
GPOR [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $2.95B. RRC’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $8.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $135.64B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GPOR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRRC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • GPOR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RRC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RRC is a better buy in the long-term than GPOR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GPOR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RRC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GPOR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RRC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GPOR is a better buy in the short-term than RRC.

Price Growth

GPOR (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -1.53% price change this week, while RRC (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -2.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -7.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

GPOR is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

RRC is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-7.01% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RRC($8.84B) has a higher market cap than GPOR($2.95B). RRC has higher P/E ratio than GPOR: RRC (9.92) vs GPOR (5.39). RRC YTD gains are higher at: 6.911 vs. GPOR (-21.136). RRC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.62B vs. GPOR (1.12B). GPOR has more cash in the bank: 2.92M vs. RRC (247K). GPOR has less debt than RRC: GPOR (824M) vs RRC (979M). RRC has higher revenues than GPOR: RRC (3.21B) vs GPOR (1.43B).
GPORRRCGPOR / RRC
Capitalization2.95B8.84B33%
EBITDA1.12B1.62B69%
Gain YTD-21.1366.911-306%
P/E Ratio5.399.9254%
Revenue1.43B3.21B45%
Total Cash2.92M247K1,183%
Total Debt824M979M84%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GPOR vs RRC: Fundamental Ratings
GPOR
RRC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5713
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3126
SMR RATING
1..100
3144
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7762
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9198
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7865

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GPOR's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as RRC (64) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that GPOR’s stock grew similarly to RRC’s over the last 12 months.

RRC's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as GPOR (31) in the null industry. This means that RRC’s stock grew similarly to GPOR’s over the last 12 months.

GPOR's SMR Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as RRC (44) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that GPOR’s stock grew similarly to RRC’s over the last 12 months.

RRC's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as GPOR (77) in the null industry. This means that RRC’s stock grew similarly to GPOR’s over the last 12 months.

GPOR's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as RRC (98) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that GPOR’s stock grew similarly to RRC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GPORRRC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GPOR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RRC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DDIV45.110.16
+0.36%
First Trust Dorsey Wright Momt & Div ETF
FOF13.620.02
+0.15%
Cohen & Steers Closed End Opportunity Fund
VTEC100.090.02
+0.02%
Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
QBUL24.20-0.10
-0.41%
TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF
OKLL6.07-0.72
-10.60%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long OKLO ETF

RRC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RRC has been closely correlated with AR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RRC jumps, then AR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RRC
1D Price
Change %
RRC100%
+0.13%
AR - RRC
87%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
EQT - RRC
82%
Closely correlated
+1.22%
GPOR - RRC
78%
Closely correlated
+1.51%
EXE - RRC
77%
Closely correlated
+0.55%
CRK - RRC
69%
Closely correlated
+2.22%
More