In the current market environment marked by subdued natural gas prices hovering below $2.70 per MMBtu, investors and traders are scrutinizing pure-play U.S. natural gas producers like Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) and Range Resources Corporation (RRC). Both companies focus on high-quality acreage in prolific basins such as Utica, Marcellus, and SCOOP, making them direct comparables for those seeking exposure to natural gas E&P amid shifting supply-demand dynamics and potential LNG export growth. This comparison highlights relative performance, valuation, and sentiment to aid decisions in volatile energy markets.
Gulfport Energy Corporation (GPOR) is an independent E&P company primarily engaged in the acquisition, exploration, and production of natural gas, crude oil, and natural gas liquids (NGLs) in the United States. Its core assets span the Utica Shale in eastern Ohio and Marcellus Shale, alongside the SCOOP (South Central Oklahoma Oil Province) Woodford and Springer formations in Oklahoma. In recent market activity, GPOR shares have traded around $193, within a 52-week range of $161-$226, supported by a year-to-date gain of about 7%. Sentiment has benefited from robust 2025 adjusted EBITDA of $878.5 million on 29% liquids growth, alongside analyst price target increases to $230 despite a leadership transition. Low natural gas prices have pressured margins, yet strong free cash flow generation ($140 million TTM) and a debt-to-equity ratio of 43% underscore operational resilience.
Range Resources Corporation (RRC) operates as an independent natural gas, NGLs, and oil producer, with premier acreage concentrated in the Appalachian Basin, including Marcellus and Utica shales. It markets production to utilities, midstream firms, and industrial end-users. Recently, RRC shares have hovered near $41, in a 52-week band of $33-$48, delivering superior year-to-date returns of 17% and 22% over one year. Performance reflects hedging effectiveness amid weak nat gas pricing, with upcoming Q1 earnings anticipated to clarify guidance. Analyst adjustments have included slight price target reductions to around $45, tempered by broader sector supply overhangs, though free cash flow remains robust at $343 million TTM and debt-to-equity at 32% signals balance sheet strength.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI-powered trading bots out of over 350 available, curated for current market conditions across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse AI/ML strategies—from multi-agent systems to volatility plays—with timeframes spanning 5 minutes to 60 days, targeting sectors like semiconductors, gold miners, and leveraged ETFs. Standout performers boast annualized returns up to +168%, win rates of 54%-88%, and profit factors exceeding 11x, such as a 60-minute multi-agent bot on USAR/SMR/CIFR with +168% returns and 75% win rate. While not exclusively focused on energy tickers, their adaptive algorithms highlight momentum in volatile assets. Traders can explore these high-performing bots for automated strategies tailored to today’s markets.
GPOR and RRC share similar business models as natural gas-heavy E&P firms, but RRC’s larger Appalachian footprint offers scale advantages over GPOR’s diversified Utica/SCOOP mix. Growth drivers include liquids exposure for GPOR (29% recent growth) versus RRC’s hedging discipline. Recent momentum favors RRC with superior returns, though GPOR’s lower valuation presents a value trade-off. Risk factors are aligned—nat gas price volatility and supply glut—but RRC’s bigger market cap and liquidity mitigate execution risks. Sector exposure is nearly identical, yet sentiment tilts toward RRC for stability amid low prices.
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward RRC due to its consistent trend strength, superior relative performance year-to-date, larger scale for liquidity, and upcoming earnings catalyst positioning it favorably in a low nat gas environment. While GPOR offers attractive valuation, RRC exhibits greater stability and momentum probability in recent data patterns.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GPOR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRRC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GPOR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RRC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
GPOR (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -1.53% price change this week, while RRC (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -2.19% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -7.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.60%.
GPOR is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
RRC is expected to report earnings on Jul 27, 2026.
The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.
| GPOR | RRC | GPOR / RRC | |
| Capitalization | 2.95B | 8.84B | 33% |
| EBITDA | 1.12B | 1.62B | 69% |
| Gain YTD | -21.136 | 6.911 | -306% |
| P/E Ratio | 5.39 | 9.92 | 54% |
| Revenue | 1.43B | 3.21B | 45% |
| Total Cash | 2.92M | 247K | 1,183% |
| Total Debt | 824M | 979M | 84% |
GPOR | RRC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 60 Fair valued | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 26 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 31 | 44 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 77 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 78 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GPOR's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as RRC (64) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that GPOR’s stock grew similarly to RRC’s over the last 12 months.
RRC's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as GPOR (31) in the null industry. This means that RRC’s stock grew similarly to GPOR’s over the last 12 months.
GPOR's SMR Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as RRC (44) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that GPOR’s stock grew similarly to RRC’s over the last 12 months.
RRC's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as GPOR (77) in the null industry. This means that RRC’s stock grew similarly to GPOR’s over the last 12 months.
GPOR's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as RRC (98) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that GPOR’s stock grew similarly to RRC’s over the last 12 months.
| GPOR | RRC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 77% | 14 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 64% | 22 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 63% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DDIV | 45.11 | 0.16 | +0.36% |
| First Trust Dorsey Wright Momt & Div ETF | |||
| FOF | 13.62 | 0.02 | +0.15% |
| Cohen & Steers Closed End Opportunity Fund | |||
| VTEC | 100.09 | 0.02 | +0.02% |
| Vanguard California Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | |||
| QBUL | 24.20 | -0.10 | -0.41% |
| TrueShares Quarterly Bull Hedge ETF | |||
| OKLL | 6.07 | -0.72 | -10.60% |
| Defiance Daily Target 2X Long OKLO ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RRC has been closely correlated with AR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RRC jumps, then AR could also see price increases.