Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
GQHPX vs RMEBX
GQHPX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts GQHPX vs RMEBX
GQHPX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GQHPX (251M). GQHPX pays higher dividends than RMEBX: GQHPX (2.76) vs RMEBX (1.04). GQHPX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: GQHPX (5 years) vs RMEBX (12 years). RMEBX (1.07) is less costly to investors than GQHPX (0.71). GQHPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 146.00 vs. RMEBX (30.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than GQHPX: RMEBX (250) vs GQHPX (2500). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.11 vs. GQHPX (8.36).
| GQHPX | RMEBX | GQHPX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.64 | 1.07 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.71 | 1.07 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.822 | 6.308 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 251M | 117B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.76 | 1.04 | 267% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.36 | 9.11 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.47 | 34.37 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 34.74 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 94.33 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement