GRDAF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
MKNGF
Price
$0.32
Change
+$0.09 (+39.13%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
32.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

GRDAF vs MKNGF

Header iconGRDAF vs MKNGF Comparison
Open Charts GRDAF vs MKNGFBanner chart's image
Grounded Lithium
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.1K
CapitalizationN/A
MKANGO RES
Price$0.32
Change+$0.09 (+39.13%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization32.14M
GRDAF vs MKNGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
GRDAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MKNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GRDAF vs. MKNGF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GRDAF is a Hold and MKNGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (GRDAF: $0.02 vs. MKNGF: $0.32)
Brand notoriety: GRDAF and MKNGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GRDAF: 4% vs. MKNGF: 64%
Market capitalization -- GRDAF: $0 vs. MKNGF: $32.14M
GRDAF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $0. MKNGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $32.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GRDAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMKNGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GRDAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MKNGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MKNGF is a better buy in the long-term than GRDAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GRDAF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MKNGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GRDAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MKNGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MKNGF is a better buy in the short-term than GRDAF.

Price Growth

GRDAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +2.24% price change this week, while MKNGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +44.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MKNGF YTD gains are higher at: 168.908 vs. GRDAF (-31.737).
GRDAFMKNGFGRDAF / MKNGF
CapitalizationN/A32.1M-
EBITDAN/A-4.66M-
Gain YTD-31.737168.908-19%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A5.25M-
Total DebtN/A1.83M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GRDAF: Fundamental Ratings
GRDAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GRDAFMKNGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GRDAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MKNGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ORGN0.580.04
+7.39%
Origin Materials
TIRX1.190.02
+1.71%
TIAN RUIXIANG Holdings Ltd
NWPX42.780.44
+1.04%
NWPX Infrastructure Inc
NIO3.510.03
+0.86%
NIO Inc.
DK23.13-0.01
-0.04%
Delek US Holdings

GRDAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRDAF and MKNGF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRDAF and MKNGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRDAF
1D Price
Change %
GRDAF100%
-0.87%
MKNGF - GRDAF
20%
Poorly correlated
+36.87%
BNTRF - GRDAF
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.55%
BRYGF - GRDAF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BMTLF - GRDAF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRKCF - GRDAF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MKNGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MKNGF and GUELF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MKNGF and GUELF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MKNGF
1D Price
Change %
MKNGF100%
+36.87%
GUELF - MKNGF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRDAF - MKNGF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.87%
FKMCF - MKNGF
9%
Poorly correlated
-3.45%
APAAF - MKNGF
9%
Poorly correlated
+26.32%
AAGFF - MKNGF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
More