Ad is loading...
GREE
Price
$2.67
Change
+$0.20 (+8.10%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
HAFG
Price
$0.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Ad is loading...

GREE vs HAFG

Header iconGREE vs HAFG Comparison
Open Charts GREE vs HAFGBanner chart's image
Greenidge Generation Holdings
Price$2.67
Change+$0.20 (+8.10%)
Volume$40.21M
CapitalizationN/A
Holistic Asset Finance Group
Price$0.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300
CapitalizationN/A
GREE vs HAFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
GREE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
GREE vs. HAFG commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GREE is a StrongSell and HAFG is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (GREE: $2.67 vs. HAFG: $0.75)
Brand notoriety: GREE and HAFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GREE: 3353% vs. HAFG: 100%
Market capitalization -- GREE: $32.15M vs. HAFG: $282.03K
GREE [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $32.15M. HAFG’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $282.03K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GREE’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHAFG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • GREE’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HAFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GREE is a better buy in the long-term than HAFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GREE’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • GREE’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

GREE (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +18.67% price change this week, while HAFG (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

GREE is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+2.23% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GREE($32.1M) has a higher market cap than HAFG($282K). HAFG YTD gains are higher at: -13.816 vs. GREE (-60.209). HAFG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.93M vs. GREE (-127.43M). GREE has more cash in the bank: 10.7M vs. HAFG (97.8K). HAFG has less debt than GREE: HAFG (432K) vs GREE (89.4M). GREE has higher revenues than HAFG: GREE (66.8M) vs HAFG (11.1M).
GREEHAFGGREE / HAFG
Capitalization32.1M282K11,383%
EBITDA-127.43M-1.93M6,618%
Gain YTD-60.209-13.816436%
P/E Ratio285.71N/A-
Revenue66.8M11.1M602%
Total Cash10.7M97.8K10,941%
Total Debt89.4M432K20,694%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HAFG: Fundamental Ratings
HAFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GREE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
GREE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARDX4.970.26
+5.52%
Ardelyx
EXC39.110.99
+2.60%
Exelon Corp
HUN19.550.26
+1.35%
Huntsman Corp
DM4.50-0.08
-1.75%
Desktop Metal
MRM2.64-0.06
-2.15%
MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies

HAFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HAFG and CIIHF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HAFG and CIIHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAFG
1D Price
Change %
HAFG100%
N/A
CIIHF - HAFG
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TVAVF - HAFG
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
GREE - HAFG
13%
Poorly correlated
+8.10%
BTCS - HAFG
10%
Poorly correlated
-10.86%
SDIG - HAFG
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
More